I'm leaning to the 'special treatment'-side. If someone puts his life at risk for your country and afterwards comes in danger because he helped your country, shouldn't your country return the favour by helping that person? I feel the answer is yes.

I was just wondering why you think that the particular country should not help that particular person
Should the US have given refuge to Saddam ? he helped them with their mission against Iran didn't he , did he deserve special treatment ? Perhaps a luxury prison suite like certain Central American dictators get .
Hmmm.....Central America , terrorists and death squads ..special treatment yes or no ?
SE Asia ....irregular guerilas in an undeclared illegal war... special treatment ?

Ah but this is interpreters isn't it , interpreters are good after all you cannot do much of an interrogation without them ...what about the interrogators then ? special treatment yes or no ?
There can be no special treatment just because "they helped you" it has to be on a case by case basis as with all immigration issues .

Now for some fun ...there were some numbers posted the other day about people helping with the mission , 349,000 apparently. will they be at risk once the coilition leaves ?
Can they get special treatment ?
Can their families ?
OK forget about the ISF......
What about Abdul the reliable floor sweeper at the mess hall ?
He works for the coilition , he will be at risk .
Can he come too ? he is special