Results 1 to 30 of 63

Thread: Is there any way to make battles more strategically decisive?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Is there any way to make battles more strategically decisive?

    I guess I misinterpreted the historical events, I stand corrected.
    The best is yet to come.
    ZX MiniMod: Where MTW meets AOE
    https://www.wmwiki.com/hosted/ZxMod.exe
    Now on beta 3 with playable golden horde!



  2. #2
    Member Member DeathEmperor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    West Palm Beach, Florida
    Posts
    150

    Default Re: Is there any way to make battles more strategically decisive?

    Well if a thread was going to be hijacked by another topic it was very fortunate that it was this one (that is about the wars of Antiochus the Great). I'm glad that abou has posted quite a bit in here as well. I hold you with much respect as a fellow admirer of the Seleukids abou


    Now regarding Magnesia I feel it gets overrated all too often as an overwhelming victory of the Romans over the Seleukids. The casualties, as abou pointed out, are also too often exaggerated on the Seleukid side and far too diminished on the Roman side. Antiochus had led a cavalry charge comprised of, from what is described in [I]The House of Seleucus: Volume 2[I], "Iranian cavalry" against the left flank of the Roman army. Most likely this cavalry force was comprised of the Kataphractoi and Agema heavy cavalry. The charge itself broke the Roman left and sent it into a rout that was closely pursued by Antiochus and his cavalry all the way to the Roman camp. Now the casualties of the Romans given by Livy as a little over 300 are far too low to reflect this, therefore I believe he chose to almost completely ignore this part of the battle and paint the Romans in the most seemingly invincible light.


    After Magnesia and the end of the Roman/Seleukid War, and the treaty of Apamea Antiochus still ruled a large and powerful empire. True he had lost Asia Minor, but then again it was never truly absorbed into the empire even after the defeat of Acheus. The distant parts of the empire, specifically Armenia, Parthia, and Bactria, did rebel when news of Antiochus' defeat reached them, but these could've been brought back fairly easily under Seleukid control if Antiochus launched a second Eastern campaign. What was important was that Antiochus still held the core parts of the empire namely Syria, Babylonia, and Persia each of which had immense recruiting potential for the royal army and possessed great wealth and the potential for more in themselves. In addition to this he had added Cilicia and Coele-Syria to his realm and their potential riches and soldiers along with them.

    Rome was hesitant at the prospect of a clash with the Seleukids before and even after their victorious war with them. They dreaded the near-mythical wealth and seemingly limitless manpower of the East in general, and despite constant exaggeration over the centuries the rumor of these resources were not completely unfounded and Antiochus alone was in a position to possess them. The Romans were reluctant, perhaps terrified, of going anywhere past the Taurus Mountain range even with the goding of their Greek allies most notably the Rhodians. If Antiochus had chosen to reconquer the East yet again, and perhaps go south and finish the Ptolemies off for good it is doubtful they would have tried to stop him.


    On the whole it is easy to overlook the genius that was Antiochus the Great, and perhaps easier to accept that after their clash with the Romans the Seleukid Empire was broken, but if anyone did so they would be making a grave mistake. Antiochus III is perhaps one of the most brilliant, but underestimated military leaders of the Ancient World and his Empire was the only one that had access to resources that could outmatch Rome's. It is an unfortunate truth, that so many things throughout history have been distorted by either time or biased sources.


    "I fought with all that I had, but at the end I was left wounded, bloodied, and broken and asking myself, "Why?"."

  3. #3

    Default Re: Is there any way to make battles more strategically decisive?

    Magnesia is a puzzle in many ways.
    One of the misteries is why Anthiochius didn't employ Hannibal properly, using him as admiral instead of a general.
    Between the two generals and the available resources there was enough potential to kick in a huge war.

    There are some fantasy scenarios in a few games that represents Magnesia as Hannibals' revenge, pitting him against Scipio once more.
    Ironically both great generals were absent from battle, one apparently mistrusted by the seleucids and the other one sick in camp.
    The best is yet to come.
    ZX MiniMod: Where MTW meets AOE
    https://www.wmwiki.com/hosted/ZxMod.exe
    Now on beta 3 with playable golden horde!



  4. #4
    American since 2012 Senior Member AntiochusIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lalaland
    Posts
    3,125

    Default Re: Is there any way to make battles more strategically decisive?

    A thread unto my own heart *looks at his screen name*

    I ought to learn more about my internet namesake. The resources on the web are awfully inadequate -- holes that go by years and little in detail. Apart from this touted The Roman War of Antiochus the Great can anyone suggest me other resources? I'll soon be off to college and that is going to both be a boon and a downer, boon since I'd probably get access to a decent library, downer because I can't possibly afford those expensive academic books.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Is there any way to make battles more strategically decisive?

    Quote Originally Posted by abou
    In my opinion, Antiochos was probably tired. He was quite old by now and had been campaigning constantly since he ascended to the Seleukid throne. Only two people come even close to this: Alexander, who didn't live very long, and Caesar who took many months on a vacation sailing on the Nile with Kleopatra probably due to exhaustion. Antiochos was also aware of the what damage the four years of fighting with Achaios had caused to the region. In the end, he went with the Treaty of Apameia, which had its pros and cons for both sides and was a far more peaceful solution.
    I think that Antiochos must have had serious financial problems. War wasn't cheap even for Seleucids. AFAIK when two ancient empires fought each other the first major battle was decisive because army upkeep was so high. One had to win and plunder enemy camp to pay the army. Looser was broke and had to sue for peace.

    The Romans are another matter. They didn't pay for solders equipment (until Marian reforms of course) paid much less their soldiers so money wasn't that big problem for them as for other countries.

    What is more Magnesia wasn't first defeat of Antiochos. He lost one or two battles trying to stop Romans in main Greece. So after Magnesia his army had very low morale, he had no money, as Abou says was tired and probably
    he was afraid that after defeat at Magnesia some more energetic governors could think it is a good time to become independent. Unfortunatelly Seleucids Empire wasn't very stable.
    Black holes really suck.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Is there any way to make battles more strategically decisive?

    to Bovi

    Where can I find this mod as you write?

    "If you want battles to be more decisive, you can try the unofficial money/merc modifications, a lot of people are very satisfied with those."

    Could you send me the prolink to this mod?
    My name is Pius, Pius 007 Curus

  7. #7
    EB annoying hornet Member bovi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    11,796

    Default Re: Is there any way to make battles more strategically decisive?

    Take a look at the unofficial mods subforum. You won't have to search very long.

    Edit: What's a prolink?
    Last edited by bovi; 08-16-2007 at 17:32.

    Having problems getting EB2 to run? Try these solutions.
    ================
    I do NOT answer PM requests for help with EB. Ask in a new help thread in the tech help forum.
    ================
    I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image. - Stephen Hawking

  8. #8

    Default Re: Is there any way to make battles more strategically decisive?

    I suspect a "Prolink" should be read as "hyperlink" - "proxy" seems somewhat unlikely.

    Apart from that: funny thing, reading. Really is.
    - Tellos Athenaios
    CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread


    ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO