Uh, probably was closed due to the bit about where you referred to the Soviets as a barbarian horde, cowardly and with no morals, whilst the Poles were apparently 'great heroic saviors'. Look, I'm not putting down the Poles or anything, and certainly the battle should be viewed as an accomplishment for the Polish. But to use that stage to degrade others and put them down, while at the same time putting your own nation on a pedastal, screams of 'blind nationalism', which is something that I'm extremely sick of here in America.

And as to whether or not the Soviets would have continued is debatable, considering that if they started conquering Germany, pretty much the rest of the world would gang up on them, including the US, Britain, France, and Italy. They wouldn't even have to like each other, as evidenced by the Soviets and US working together in WWII. Just out of neccessity, the other countries would have banded together, and the Soviets would have been stopped, more than likely. Additionally, empires eventualy reach a 'breaking point'. The Romans did. The Mongols did. The Ottomans did. Eventually, a single country can only effectively administer so much of an area, especially in after the advent of nationalism. The Soviets, if they had taken Poland, would have been near that 'breaking point'.

Also, your 'historians'? Could you please cite a source for these people? Tell us who they are, what background, etc...?