Reintroduction of Eras?

**Fisherking** · 08-29-2007, 10:26

Well it would be great to see but this time line is not the longest... Maybe in the sequel! LOL

I know something like this from around 1500 to the 1860s would be a real blast and need some eras in there.

Wouldn't you love to send Morgan's Priviteers to Pannama and loot it...

**Darkarbiter** · 08-30-2007, 07:07

Originally Posted by Fisherking

Well it would be great to see but this time line is not the longest... Maybe in the sequel! LOL

I know something like this from around 1500 to the 1860s would be a real blast and need some eras in there.

Wouldn't you love to send Morgan's Priviteers to Pannama and loot it...

Clearly a Napoleonic sequal would be great. I wonder how they'd handle skirmishers...

**pevergreen** · 08-30-2007, 07:16

Welcome back!

**Rodion Romanovich** · 08-30-2007, 08:47

Like I said before, good eras IMO would be:
- Great Northern War (1700)
- 7 years war (1754)
- American war of independence (1775)
- French revolution (1789)

**Warluster** · 08-30-2007, 08:50

I realy can't see exansions though. All suggested dates are already covered. I say, if they have a expansioin, it would proabably have the Thirty Years War, plus a extended time date to 1860 for Crimea, etc.

**Rodion Romanovich** · 08-30-2007, 08:54

Well, I could see a Napoleonic expansion with more Napoleonic units added (I guess the Napoleonic period units won't be the focus of the unit rooster in vanilla E:TW), covering 1789 to 1815, with 1 month = 1 turn

**Warluster** · 08-30-2007, 09:02

But honestly, what could they do? A lot of the campaign would force you to do stuff, like play Trafalgar, or Waterloo or Austerlitz just to get it Napoleonic, and by then you could play those battles originally with original game. Lol, waste of time making that one I say.