Arrogance?
Arrogance?
Only a few seek liberty; the majority seek nothing more than fair masters - Sallust
A lie told often enough becomes truth - Vladimir Lenin
Vietnam because of terrain difficulties. The Vietcong was used to the forests, while the US wasn't. Also, fighting against Guerilla tactics is pretty difficult.Otherwise, how could the US loose the Vietnam and Iraq wars???
Iraq's something different. The word "Bush" comes to mind...
But I do not wish to turn this thread into a political one, so that'll be that.
The Throne Room: "Less a forum, more a way of life." Econ21
Don't hesitate to visit the Mead Hall! A little more reading, a little less shouting, please.
Join the latest greatest installement of mafia games: Capo di Tutti Capi!
Check out the Gahzette!
By the by, are you interested in helping out the Gahzette? Think you could be a writer, reporting on the TW or Org community? Then check the Gahzette Thread or drop me a PM!
Back.
Not to mention the lack of discipline and decent leadership, and the overestimation of chopper insertions/extractions for missions. Choppers land in the open, giving the troops little cover at the beginning of a battle, and the troops also lacked proper artillery and other heavy support... To solve this problem, deforestation chemicals such as Agent Orange was used, killing and poisoning millions of civilians, still without cutting casualties much because of the difficulties of properly giving close, accurate support to the ground troops from choppers and planes... Besides there was always the possibility for the guerilla to avoid the already deforested areas, and next time strike where there were still trees.Originally Posted by Warmaster Horus
Originally Posted by Warmaster Horus
![]()
Same for meOriginally Posted by Warmaster Horus
![]()
Under construction...
"In countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Norway, there is no separation of church and state." - HoreTore
Bookmarks