Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Witing for 1.6

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    BLEEEE! Senior Member Daveybaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Hastings, UK
    Posts
    767

    Default Re: Witing for 1.6

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaius Terentius Varro
    So your waiting for EB 1.0 last 2 years 'cos the units in Rome weren't historicaly accurate was justified but not my rant. Here's to you Dayve...
    ??? You must have me confused with someone else - i've never played EB, and i'm not really one of those people who is obsessed with historical accuracy.

    Also, i cant figure out what that stereogram is supposed to be - looks like some sort of cave or something... but at least i have a headache now, so that's good.

    Anyhow, it wasnt the rant that i was commenting on, so much as quitting an entire campaign because a picture doesnt match a number. With all of the bugs in the total war series over the years, if details that small annoy you that much i'm amazed youre still buying the games. I thought it was a given that to be a fan of the series you have to have a relaxed attitude to things like this. Otherwise its kinda like going to rap concerts every weekend even though you hate rap music.
    Last edited by Daveybaby; 09-06-2007 at 11:17.

  2. #2
    Where's your head at? Member Galain_Ironhide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Kalgoorlie, Western Australia
    Posts
    427

    Default Re: Witing for 1.6

    Yeh I have had several drinks and am already cross-eyed as a result of it, I still can't make out the picture!
    - 'Let's finish the game.' - Josiah Gordon "Doc" Scurlock

    Read my AAR - BC Kingdom of Jerusalem - For Faith or Greed



  3. #3

    Default Re: Witing for 1.6

    While it doesnt "ruin" my game experience, i feel its sad not to have accurate unit stats. While we could of course mod the game, i hope we'll have those units corrected in the next patch.

  4. #4
    Filthy Rich Member Odin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Just West of Boston
    Posts
    1,973

    Default Re: Witing for 1.6

    Quote Originally Posted by zerathule
    While it doesnt "ruin" my game experience, i feel its sad not to have accurate unit stats. While we could of course mod the game, i hope we'll have those units corrected in the next patch.
    Nah, some clever forum member will come along and mod the game and correct inaccuracies.

    then post a link to his mod in his sig and wear it like a badge. Then other posters will extoll his prowess as a modder and how he enhanced the game.

    This is how the PC gaming industry works now, they get the games playable and for the most part solid, paying customers then finish it for them. Its perfect really when you think about it, posters can become legends with a simple "2 handed fix" mod, and the developer gets the bump from thier work, and to top it off they paid for the product first before modding !

    Of course it also stems from people buying product at release with the expectation that the above paragraph was fulfilled by the developer. Its as plain as the nose on my face, customers are rewarding incomplete games with thier purchase at release.

    There are few things more annoying than some idiot who has never done anything trying to say definitively how something should be done.

    Sua Sponte

  5. #5

    Default Re: Witing for 1.6

    Working as a software programing team manager, i can understand that bugs and issues are unavoidable for multiple reasons. While the unexpected error, or hidden one is hard to avoid, some obvious errors are sometimes not corrected, even if the developpment team has identified it.
    Developpers are constantly under pressure, with very short delays, and if I have to choose between correcting an obvious error and adding a major feature (even if uncomplete) i'll choose not to correct the bug if the testing team hasnt seen it.
    In fact just today i've told one of my team members not to spend the two days required to correct a bug until the testing team sees it, because if he did correct it, we'd be late for our next release, and my boss would hit me in the face :)

    Anyway, here i'm a "user" or costumer, and i sure would like a perfect product. I dont expect a perfect game, and hell i'm glad to have paid 30 euros for that game i'll play hundreds of hours even despite the bugs, and there is NO game on the market that comes close to the Total War series.
    But please CA, correct that bug :)

  6. #6
    Amazing Mothman Member icek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    350

    Default Re: Witing for 1.6

    You forgot to mention those lithuanian twohanded pagan Sith psychos that have +8 to defence from shield (?)

    See for yourself.
    Last edited by icek; 09-07-2007 at 16:33.

  7. #7
    Member Member Roy1991's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    228

    Default Re: Witing for 1.6

    2 more:
    Venetian Pavise crossbow militia (Crusades campaign) don't have shields (should have them), but have the shield bonus.
    Greek Fire-throwers have a shield bonus of 5, but no shield (and shouldn't have one)
    Last edited by Roy1991; 09-07-2007 at 19:47.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO