Is unsourced "specific" mudslinging any better? The outrageous crap they come up with belies how seriously they must take Thompson as a candidate.Originally Posted by greaterkhaan
The lobbying for Aristide charge is a real gem. Yep, lobbied for a brutal dictator and therefore supports everything that Aristide did- including "necklacing". What's that based on? The fact that his firm filed lobbying paperwork listing Aristide. The Thompson campaign admits to making one phone call that advocated keeping an embargo in place.... so yeah, he supports necklacing.![]()
Other things like:are impossible to respond to. What votes? On what bills? When?He's voted 14 times against the Constitutional right to bear arms.
The only claim that I know to have any validity is that he voted for McCain-Feingold.. Bad Thompson.![]()
I'll take that any day to a candidate who actually campaigns on a return to the gold-standard, an anti-free trade platform, and moonbat conspiracies about a secret plan for a new super-government that will rule all of Mexico, Canada and the US.http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues
Edit: Oh, and straw polls are meaningless- a scientific poll taken from likely voters is a far more accurate predictor. Sure, Paul has some highly motivated supporters, but they only make up 2-3% of primary voters.
Bookmarks