Is Kingdoms more Challenging?

[Daithi MacGuillaCathair]

i dont think so, i played as the irish on VH and in no time had invaded england and taken most of the south coast, i only stopped to give them time to build up more armys to fight.

Gave the french a hammering with my Apaches, didnt loose one battle to them despite them having two stacks of european troops to one stack of my basic indigenous troops plus one of reinforcements, i never even used my reinforcemtns, granted i was at a ford, but still you think their over whelming fire power could have driven me back.

i havent found any real change in the level of AI

[Cadwallon]

I've found the American campaign (VH/VH) as the Apachean in particular very challenging. I actually lose battles that are relatively equal!

Even the Britannia campaign as the Welsh - the English are making major inroads after my initial onslaught. I've also looked at the Teutonic campaign - and after about 20 turn I'm stuffed financially, with the Lithuanians and Novgorodians breathing down my neck with now way for me to train new soldiers!

So yes - I think they are more challenging than the grand campaign.

[Bob the Insane]

I think some of the faction's in the different campaigns are in very challenging positions...

[Husar]

As the Teutonic Order I managed to drive back the Lithuanians only to face several full stacks from Novgorod who managed to take several settlements. Especially their boyar sons are deadly accurate now, the even kill men on walls with ease.