I've noticed, and no doubt someone else has, that forts that haven't been occupied for years - over a hundred in one instance - but still retain the flag of their last occupant, can be treated as if they are still occupied.
Diplomats can talk to the empty stone walls and negotiate treaties etc, which is useful if the party concerned is several years journey away but there's also a downside. Occupy an empty fort and the previous occupant, however long absent, will take umbrage and relations may even descend to abysmal, or worse, war, if things haven't been exactly hunky dory beforehand.
Bookmarks