Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 107

Thread: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

  1. #1
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    http://www.ituc-csi.org/spip.php?article1404

    Horrible and despicable.

    Quote Originally Posted by Article
    An appalling total of 144 trade unionists were murdered for defending workers’ rights in 2006, while more than 800 suffered beatings or torture, according to the Annual Survey of Trade Union Rights Violations, published by the 168-million member International Trade Union Confederation. The 379-page report details nearly 5,000 arrests and more than 8,000 dismissals of workers due to their trade union activities. 484 new cases of trade unionists held in detention by governments are also documented in the report.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  2. #2

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    America, especially, needs more unionists. $100,000 plus benifits a year for screwing on the armrest of an Escalade is corporate fraud!

    Unions had a place, but are now damaging industry in the West.

  3. #3
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Don't confuse the corrupt version of the union system in America with the real and important unions.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  4. #4
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    This makes me want to throw-up.
    Unions had a place, but are now damaging industry in the West.
    There we go... someone has played the predictable card. Stop de-humanising the economy. It is supposed to be run for the people, so let the people run it.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    I'm not against unions. People have a right to organise for whatever reason they want. Companies shouldn't allow them to dictate their policy, however.

  6. #6
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bellum
    I'm not against unions. People have a right to organise for whatever reason they want. Companies shouldn't allow them to dictate their policy, however.
    So you believe that a Company has the right to ignore Unions? If so, I fail to see what a Union would achieve.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  7. #7
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    I was a union man for many, many years. What I didn't like about the set up was the top down action. By that I mean orders from the hierarchy instructing us on industrial action. Woe betide anyone who disagreed.

    Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    What's with the 'we' business? I don't feel the need for a self-serving bunch of onanists telling me what to do.

    Anyway, when I started my own business I banned unions. It was my business after all. If any of the staff didn't like that, they could sling their hook.

    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  8. #8
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Anyway, when I started my own business I banned unions. It was my business after all. If any of the staff didn't like that, they could sling their hook.
    Do Discrimation laws cover this in your country (UK if I remember correctly...)? They do here.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  9. #9
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by CountArach
    Do Discrimation laws cover this in your country (UK if I remember correctly...)? They do here.
    What was I discriminating about? All the staff were subject to it.
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  10. #10
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by InsaneApache
    What was I discriminating about? All the staff were subject to it.
    Discriminating on the basis of Union Membership. Down here it is illegal to fire someone on the basis of belonging to a union.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  11. #11
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by CountArach
    Discriminating on the basis of Union Membership. Down here it is illegal to fire someone on the basis of belonging to a union.
    "Up here" it's illegal to even touch unions with a negative attitude. In fact, the employer has to teach the would-be employee about the benefits of being a union member...
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  12. #12
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Wait! You mean that the business I set up with my money, mortgaging my home and me working for no pay for the first year, should then be told that I have to employ only unionistas?

    Thank god not in the UK anymore.

    Jeez some people.
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  13. #13
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    I can see where the jokes concerning the eroding Dover cliffs come from.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  14. #14
    L'Etranger Senior Member Banquo's Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hunting the Snark, a long way from Tipperary...
    Posts
    5,604

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    As I recall from when I ran a business in the UK, one cannot bar an employee from belonging to a union and obtaining advice and guidance from that source.

    However, as the employer you do not have to recognise the union as having any official capacity (ie for wage bargaining) - one deals entirely with the individual employee regardless of their memberships. If the employer decides to recognise a union, then the representatives from that union may speak on behalf of a group of employees.

    For example, in a business that does not recognise a union, a disciplinary procedure would involve the employee. Because employment law states that an employee subject to a formal disciplinary is entitled to a witness/advisor, the employee who is a union member may bring a union representative to the meeting - whether the union is formally recognised or not. But equally they might bring their lawyer - or their mum, all of whom would have the same status in the disciplinary.

    Clear as mud, I expect.
    "If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
    Albert Camus "Noces"

  15. #15
    The Usual Member Ice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Northville, Michigan
    Posts
    4,259

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Why exactly do we still need, or did we ever need socialism?

    Why not just basic protection for the basic rights of workers?

    Unions should be allowed, TO AN EXTENT

    They always should be willing to meet the company halfway. Likewise for their employers.

    Dictatorships and authoritarian governments in Belarus, Burma, China, Cuba, Equatorial Guinea, Iran, North Korea and several Gulf countries maintained their suppression of independent trade unions, with more than 100 Chinese workers detained in prisons and forced labour camps in appalling conditions. The Zimbabwean government continued its violent repression of the country’s trade union movement. Of 265 participants in a trade union protest who were arrested by the authorities, 15 including the top leaders of the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions were severely beaten whilst in detention.
    Eh, I don't think socialism is the answer to the problems in those countries.



  16. #16
    Thread killer Member Rodion Romanovich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    The dark side
    Posts
    5,383

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by PanzerJager
    America, especially, needs more unionists. $100,000 plus benifits a year for screwing on the armrest of an Escalade is corporate fraud!

    Unions had a place, but are now damaging industry in the West.
    I agree, let's remove the unions, and use these instead:

    Under construction...

    "In countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Norway, there is no separation of church and state." - HoreTore

  17. #17
    Thread killer Member Rodion Romanovich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    The dark side
    Posts
    5,383

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ice
    Why exactly do we still need, or did we ever need socialism?

    Why not just basic protection for the basic rights of workers?

    Unions should be allowed, TO AN EXTENT
    When there are corporate-funded organizations cooperating to screw workers as much as possible and drive down their salaries, there won't be any "basic protection for the basic rights of workers". Governments too tend to be really bad at protecting the rights of the workers, especially with the way western "the-mock-crazy" works: vote for a package of opinions, instead of separately for each issue. Usually in package-voting, the entire choice of who rules the country is based on a single or a few questions, and worker rights are often forgotten.

    Pre-18th century the workers got screwed because the rich had good administration cooperating to further their own goals, while poor had no organization at all. Post 18th century, this form of organization between poor, turned tables and made the poor even more influential than the rich due to their numbers. Now, unions and socialist parties are getting undermined in power, and cooperation and socialistic ideology are dissolving, while globalization also strengthens the companies (modern counterpart to nobility) again. Unions and moderate socialism are good peaceful ways of defending against oppression from the stronger, the guilliotinne becomes the only alternative if political measures prevent the poor from being able to influence the decisions of the rich in time by peaceful measures, before the misery grows too strong. The surveillance technology is another such threat towards the poor, that is growing these days. It causes silence and fear of protesting the society developments, and may also strive to take us back to alternating between oppression and guilliotinne.

    That's why I think socialism is needed again, to fight both communists, guilliotinne users, and oppressors and anti-democratic measures. Nobody will really benefit more than a few years from the breakdown of moderate socialism.
    Last edited by Rodion Romanovich; 09-25-2007 at 19:05.
    Under construction...

    "In countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Norway, there is no separation of church and state." - HoreTore

  18. #18
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    At the painting business I worked at recently, one of the older hands told me they used to be a unionized group, but they weren't anymore. He also said that being in a union shop will get you a certain wage depending on experience, but that not being union will get you paid what your worth.

    Now, I don't think people (aside from public employees) should be barred from unionizing, but companies should be free to ignore any unions, fire employees trying to turn their business into a unionized one, and not have closed shops.

    CR
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  19. #19
    Jillian & Allison's Daddy Senior Member Don Corleone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    7,588

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    There's no such thing as an industry that has an organized workforce that didn't do something to deserve them in the first place. But labor unions are a permanent solution to a temporary problem. Once the original grievance is resolved, they don't disband, they invent new 'issues' to try to justify their existence.

    And besides, don't think you the Union's own propaganda about its activities to be just a little slanted guys? You won't believe a story in the Wall Street Journal, but you'll take as gospel the union's own newsletter? There's some objective thinking for you...
    "A man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man."
    Don Vito Corleone: The Godfather, Part 1.

    "Then wait for them and swear to God in heaven that if they spew that bull to you or your family again you will cave there heads in with a sledgehammer"
    Strike for the South

  20. #20
    Mystic Bard Member Soulforged's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Another Skald
    Posts
    2,138

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ice
    Why exactly do we still need, or did we ever need socialism?

    Why not just basic protection for the basic rights of workers?
    Where do you think those "basic rights of workers" come from?
    Born On The Flames

  21. #21
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Corleone
    And besides, don't think you the Union's own propaganda about its activities to be just a little slanted guys? You won't believe a story in the Wall Street Journal, but you'll take as gospel the union's own newsletter? There's some objective thinking for you...
    When it comes to american unions, I have no problem believing a WSJ article declaring them idiots, as, well, they do seem to behave like idiots...

    However, this article wasn't about them, it was about union workers in china getting hunted down and killed for trying to demand a break every 6 hours and things like that...
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  22. #22
    The Usual Member Ice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Northville, Michigan
    Posts
    4,259

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by Soulforged
    Where do you think those "basic rights of workers" come from?


    Unions and the government?



  23. #23
    The Usual Member Ice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Northville, Michigan
    Posts
    4,259

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    When there are corporate-funded organizations cooperating to screw workers as much as possible and drive down their salaries, there won't be any "basic protection for the basic rights of workers".
    I'm pretty sure most corporations try to make a profit, and their primary goal is not to "screw workers". Many treat their workers well to attract investors who actually care about who they are investing in.

    Governments too tend to be really bad at protecting the rights of the workers, especially with the way western "the-mock-crazy" works: vote for a package of opinions, instead of separately for each issue. Usually in package-voting, the entire choice of who rules the country is based on a single or a few questions, and worker rights are often forgotten.
    Not really true. Maybe 50-100 a hundred years ago, but I'd have to disagree now.

    Now, unions and socialist parties are getting undermined in power, and cooperation and socialistic ideology are dissolving, while globalization also strengthens the companies (modern counterpart to nobility) again.
    There are many advantages/disadvantages to globalization , one advantage being the increased factor of competition and the lower price of goods to the consumer. One disadvantage being workers losing jobs to other places. That is another topic though.

    Unions and moderate socialism are good peaceful ways of defending against oppression from the stronger, the guilliotinne becomes the only alternative if political measures prevent the poor from being able to influence the decisions of the rich in time by peaceful measures, before the misery grows too strong.
    This isn't the 18th century. Your argument can't really be directly applied to many situations today.

    The surveillance technology is another such threat towards the poor, that is growing these days. It causes silence and fear of protesting the society developments, and may also strive to take us back to alternating between oppression and guilliotinne.
    While surveillance technology exists, you seem to be exagerating a bit.

    That's why I think socialism is needed again, to fight both communists, guilliotinne users, and oppressors and anti-democratic measures. Nobody will really benefit more than a few years from the breakdown of moderate socialism.
    Again, I disagree. Communists? Guiliotinne users? Anti-democratic measures?

    Examples of how this applies to modern society would be nice.



  24. #24
    American since 2012 Senior Member AntiochusIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Lalaland
    Posts
    3,125

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ice
    Unions and the government?
    Oh, come on. It's pretty obvious. Socialism. The whole bloody ideology bases itself on protecting the people's rights against the Robber Barons tm .

    Nobody in their right mind (I don't count extreme capitalists, fascists, and other assorted nuttorios as particularly sensible) would deny socialism's place in history for forcing the powers-that-be to take action to improve the lot of Joe Commoner. Though this thread is about whether the concrete ideology of socialism is still needed or not.

    Without...whatwasit, Knights of Labor?...protesting and rioting back in the day we probably wouldn't see workers being treated as decent human beings for quite a while in the History of Man.

    Though I agree that you can't necessarily compare the AFL-CIO's activities to the few brave Chinese people who dared stand against the scums in Beijing with only torture rooms and firing squads waiting for them at the end of the road.
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Corleone
    And besides, don't think you the Union's own propaganda about its activities to be just a little slanted guys? You won't believe a story in the Wall Street Journal, but you'll take as gospel the union's own newsletter?
    I always thought they were crap myself. All they say is "Bush is evil. Bush is evil. Bush is evil." Boring.

  25. #25
    Come to daddy Member Geoffrey S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach
    Posts
    4,028

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore
    However, this article wasn't about them, it was about union workers in china getting hunted down and killed for trying to demand a break every 6 hours and things like that...
    Precisely. In countries where whether there is socialism is the least of the people's worries.
    "The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr

  26. #26
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by Geoffrey S
    Precisely. In countries where whether there is socialism is the least of the people's worries.
    Bah. There's Maoism and Marxist-leninism.

    Marx held the idea that workers should own the factory where they work themselves. Lenin decided that the state should own the factory, and the unions and workers should be happy about it.

    You get the same in a leninist state that you have in a brutal capitalist state. I'm not promoting marxist-leninism, I'm promoting socialism. Reformist socialism, if you will. And that's not present in either China, Burma or Thailand.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  27. #27
    Come to daddy Member Geoffrey S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach
    Posts
    4,028

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    How does that relate to my post?

    What can socialism offer those people more than any other (not dicatatorship or whatever) form of political ideology could offer? The problems in the countries mentioned in the articles aren't caused by a lack of socialism, but by the presence of dictatorships, military regimes, etc. Any change would be preferable, and I really don't see the link to a necessity of socialism in general based on the presented article.
    "The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr

  28. #28
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore
    Bah. There's Maoism and Marxist-leninism.

    Marx held the idea that workers should own the factory where they work themselves. Lenin decided that the state should own the factory, and the unions and workers should be happy about it.

    You get the same in a leninist state that you have in a brutal capitalist state. I'm not promoting marxist-leninism, I'm promoting socialism. Reformist socialism, if you will. And that's not present in either China, Burma or Thailand.
    Socialism is the oppression of the working classes.
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  29. #29
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Well, "really existing socialism" has indeed turned out to be that way - but then again, it's not like China for example was paying even lip service to Marxist economic theory anymore (it is actually debatable if any of the Communist states ever did to begin with, given that Marxist theory cannot actually be employed to understand their crackpot systems). It's free-for-all capitalism of the jolly bad old mid-1800s fashion there now.

    That's the endgame of revolutionary Communism for you.

    Reformatory Socialism, or "Social Democracy" as it's also known, has - besides been earnestly hated by both revolutionary Communists and all brands of Fascists - however proven to work right fine, as us folks up here in Scandinavia can attest to. And much of the rest of the part of Europe that wasn't dragooned into sharing the "really existing socialism" experience, for that matter.

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Corleone
    But labor unions are a permanent solution to a temporary problem. Once the original grievance is resolved, they don't disband, they invent new 'issues' to try to justify their existence.
    And since when did things remain static ? New grievances pop up readily enough (although often they're just aspects of the old ones thathaven't yet been addressed) and more importantly the second they get the opportunity the Management will start trying to cut costs in all the merry old ugly ways - when the cat is away the mice...

    Since they these days have a hard time doing it to the workers in the First World, they've moved it to the Third since logistics and communications and suchlike now make it feasible. Somewhat curiously, they also seem to employ rank thuggery to brutalize and terrorize their workforce there to bend knee as needed, and merrily engage in straight corruption with whatever authorities now exist to try and keep the peons in line and unorganized.
    Which is pretty much exactly what they were doing here in the "West" not even a hundred years back.


    Plus, there's the fact that the workers are basically making a living selling their work capacity to the employers. What's wrong with them banding together so they can negotiate as good "returns of investement" out of it as possible ?
    Last edited by Watchman; 09-25-2007 at 22:12.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  30. #30
    Master of useless knowledge Senior Member Kitten Shooting Champion, Eskiv Champion Ironside's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,902

    Default Re: Why we still need socialism in 2008.

    Quote Originally Posted by InsaneApache
    Socialism is the oppression of the working classes.
    Considering that Socialism arose from a very obvious oppression of the working classes, I'm taking it that you argue that it's outlived it's purpose?

    I would make a claim with that:

    In a not that far future Socialism will be a neccessity for a stable society.

    You cannot aviod it.

    That is unless we came up with something completely new system. Or accept some very nasty human treatment.

    Why you may ask? Well, if you promise to atleast try to make a decent attemt to counter it, I'll tell you (I don't really expect you to succeed, it's a natural consequence). Mentioned it before but then none responded at all

    Quote Originally Posted by Ice
    I'm pretty sure most corporations try to make a profit, and their primary goal is not to "screw workers". Many treat their workers well to attract investors who actually care about who they are investing in.
    The problem is that some will "screw the workers" if they get the chance. And something isn't really working well if it "only" screws half the work-force.
    We are all aware that the senses can be deceived, the eyes fooled. But how can we be sure our senses are not being deceived at any particular time, or even all the time? Might I just be a brain in a tank somewhere, tricked all my life into believing in the events of this world by some insane computer? And does my life gain or lose meaning based on my reaction to such solipsism?

    Project PYRRHO, Specimen 46, Vat 7
    Activity Recorded M.Y. 2302.22467
    TERMINATION OF SPECIMEN ADVISED

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO