CR, you SERIOUSLY need to upgrade your ideas of what a modern tyranny would look like.The 2nd was written to create a last resort safeguard against tyranny.
That is not impossible today
I don't agree. Over the years I have changed my mind on this issue. (where's the drummer smilie gone?) The argument that if the government is going to deny you a means of self defence, they are under a duty actually to defend you seems to be a strong one. Given that the UK police do not in fact defend you, by what right are they saying that self defence is not an acceptable "good reason" foir a firearms licence? I can't see any good argument, anymore, for why (eg) a handgun should not be available on licence, subject to the existing UK FAC checks, to be held ONLY within your own house, or to and from a home office registered range for practice.These threads are so damn pointless. For crying out loud CR stop bringing the subject up!
This is of course not what the Rabbit wants, but it would be very different to the existing UK situation too.
I still don't think I'd want one myself, but I think I should be allowed to choose.
Bookmarks