i wonder if anyone has researched the 'Celts' as far as Britain is concerned? According to Historians the 'Celts' term has only been used to apply to the British people has only existed since, 1792? Where a group decieved everyone and made a 'Druid' ceremony and called it Celtic!!
The Romans used to call the Celts 'Galli' and never refered to the Britons as 'Galli', Celts but just Britanni peoples. Yes the languages were similar, but not the same, even art found in Ireland which has this 'Celtic' label has no evidence it was produced by a concentrated tribe like the Celts.
Most historians now believe that certain parts of Britain adopted the 'Celtic' language and some of their traits but were NOT invaded by them. I suppose the most obvious is through trade, for instance there is a copper mine in North Wales that dates back to 3500BC!!
They also seem to say that no massacre took place when the Saxons came but they just integrated, they couldn't have massacred the Celts anyway as technically they didn't wxist in Britain, lol.
I find this a fascinating subject and am still researching it. There was a recent DNA study down in certain parts of the UK but it is ultimately flawed, no I'm not ignoring science. But there was a much indepth Female DNA study done which showed more realistic results.
There was a skeleton found at Cheddar gorge which dates 9000 years ago which is just a few hundred years after Britain came out of the Ice age and became an Island, they took DNA from this skeleton (female DNA is present in males and females but it provides an unbroken link which is hard to refute) and they found the same DNA still present in the people present locally. This proves that there was no invasion by the Celts and the Ancient Britons still remained Native.
So if you have a Celt tribe for the British Isles take it out and use it for the East and give Britain the Brittanni people, lol.
Bookmarks