http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/...ons/index.html
Like were going to deport him pfffffft. He reaps what he sows
"Welcome to the thunderdome *****"
The State of Texas V The United States Of America
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/...ons/index.html
Like were going to deport him pfffffft. He reaps what he sows
"Welcome to the thunderdome *****"
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
Re: The State of Texas V The United States Of America
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
Legally, he deserves a new trial if that's what the international body ruled.The Constitution's Article VI says "all treaties made ... shall be the supreme law of the land, and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby."
"The Constitution means what it says," said Justice Stephen Breyer. "But there happened to be a few instances where the nature of the obligation or the intent of the party makes it difficult to enforce it as a binding judgment of a[n international] court. That is not this case."
I don't see where we are going to deport him?
Although, I do agree death is warranted for such a heinous crime of gang rape and murder. I'd be satisfied with that or life imprisonment with heavy labor.
Last edited by Ice; 10-11-2007 at 03:12.
Re: The State of Texas V The United States Of America
Go Texas.
CR
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
Re: The State of Texas V The United States Of America
Go legal international treaties.
What kind of circumvention is that to say something like "Oh, we made a treaty with you, true, but you see, it's not applicable in our [provinces] because they are almost-not-really-wannabe-sovereign"?
The Constitution is clear on this case.
Of course if the evidence is clear, which I'd hazard a guess it is, the verdict won't come out particularly different.
Re: The State of Texas V The United States Of America
Go legal international treaties.
what for?
crime was commited in texas
Re: The State of Texas V The United States Of America
Read the article. It is fairly obvious.
Re: The State of Texas V The United States Of America
shrugh* oookay
*reads it
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks