Results 1 to 30 of 585

Thread: 1.0 Succession Game Discussion Thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member EasternScourge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Southern United States
    Posts
    112

    Default Re: 1.0 Succession Game Discussion Thread

    I'm in the same boat as Xehh II.I won't be avaible for 3-4 days.Anyways,I'm fne with Carthage,though prepare for me to mess up as I have yet to play as them in EB.Now,what will we do for rules and such concerning ruling cities?Does the faction leader control the building,or would the governor choose the buildings (I assume armies are still under the faction leader control).

    Also,are we going to use those civil-war ideas I sent you a while back, or are not going to do that.I'm assuming we will discuss this all and more though.

  2. #2
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: 1.0 Succession Game Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by EasternScourge
    Now,what will we do for rules and such concerning ruling cities?
    I was thinking, that since we'll probably have almost enough characters for everyone at the start, governors will choose buildings in their provinces.

    This sounds complicated, but the council could determine which provinces deserve what % of the treasury, and then the governors could decide what should be built in their provinces.

    Armies recruited in lands with Type I and II gov's will be under the Shophets control. Armies recruited in lands with Type III and IV gov's will be controlled by the governor i.e. he tells the player by pm where he wants the army in his land to go.

    Governors can declare war on armies encroaching on their territory without permission from the council, but armies invading foreign lands are controlled by the council, and the leading general will be chosen by the Shophet.

    I plan on taking ideas I like from everyone and drawing up a constitution, so everyone knows what they can and cannot do.

    As for the civil war, it might be a little ahistorical for Carthage, as they never really experienced a civil war as such, only revolting mercenaries.

    All ideas are possible though. I'd like to hear some of your guys' ideas....
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  3. #3
    Handler of candles Member Xehh II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Super Magical Greatness Land
    Posts
    1,367

    Default Re: 1.0 Succession Game Discussion Thread

    So, is Carthage set? I don't think I would do well as Carthage.
    A ha ha! Rainbows and unicorns! Rainbows and unicorns!

  4. #4
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: 1.0 Succession Game Discussion Thread

    It isn't set per se, but we will have to come to a conclusion in the next 72 hours, and I think most people have said that Carthage is acceptable.

    Why would you not do well? I think you should give it a whirl. Carthage is pretty good. We would just have to try and avoid an eary war with Romani....maybe I'll make you a governor of an island so you won't be messed with.

    Here's a question for you guys....what do you think about playing on the BI.exe? It's no big deal if the majority don't want to, but it makes for a more interesting game with the increased naval invasions.
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  5. #5
    Amanuensis Member pezhetairoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    South of Sabara
    Posts
    2,719

    Default Re: 1.0 Succession Game Discussion Thread

    Hmm, BI.exe. has screwed up my game muchly (see the roman_forts thread in the bug reports). RomeTW gives me the most stable gameplay, and I would go for RTW.exe. For the record, I'm perfectly okay with the Qarthadastim. If it comes down to assigning of governorships, do give me Trinakrie ;-) I'll be wanting a shot at them Romani with the Syrakousiai Hoplitai and assorted other units.


    EB DEVOTEE SINCE 2004

  6. #6
    Megas Alexandros's heir Member Spoofa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    695

    Default Re: 1.0 Succession Game Discussion Thread

    no way man! Hamilicar is mine for the taking!

  7. #7
    Pincushioned Ashigaru Member Poulp''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    464

    Default Re: 1.0 Succession Game Discussion Thread

    Carthage's fine with me.
    As is playing any character.

    I have a few questions too.

    Does someone know how Carthage's government worked ? Historically speaking.
    From what I recall, it was a republic with the same kind of governement than Rome (a house of elected rich citizenry I mean)
    Knowing a bit more should help me to get in the mood.

    What will be the unit size ? Can game options be changed from one computer to another ? (screen size, graphic details, etc...)

    Who should play the inter turn battles ? If I remember correctly, there had been problems with this in the Council of KH.

    I propose a house rule: when the faction leader reach age 50 and/or he settles to go to war in person, we should hold an election to choose the heir among the best candidate at that time (sure, a lot of in game characters will be pissed, but, hey that's politics)

    Another proposition, if a in-forum character turns out to be a compassionate governor, concerned with the welfare of his subjects, he might get some traits representing this in-game.
    Or, you can turn it the other way around, an in-game warmonger should be role played accordingly on the forum.

    that's all for now

    I have yet to dl the 1.0 version, I'm still busy with cleaning my CPU and making space on my HD

    I might cancel myself out if I see my CPU is lagging me to death
    Last edited by Poulp'; 10-12-2007 at 16:27.

  8. #8
    Handler of candles Member Xehh II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Super Magical Greatness Land
    Posts
    1,367

    Default Re: 1.0 Succession Game Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Bootsiuv
    Here's a question for you guys....what do you think about playing on the BI.exe? It's no big deal if the majority don't want to, but it makes for a more interesting game with the increased naval invasions.
    I don't have BI.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sakkura
    Quisque est barbarus alio.
    What does that mean?
    A ha ha! Rainbows and unicorns! Rainbows and unicorns!

  9. #9
    I is da bestest at grammar Member Strategos Alexandros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Here.
    Posts
    538

    Default Re: 1.0 Succession Game Discussion Thread

    "Everyone is a barbarian to someone"
    - my first balloon, from Mouzafphaerre
    - LS balloon

    Modo Egredior
    https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bi...ookup=Plb.+toc <- read this!
    "Do you know what's worth fighting for?
    When it's not worth dying for?"

  10. #10
    Amanuensis Member pezhetairoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    South of Sabara
    Posts
    2,719

    Default Re: 1.0 Succession Game Discussion Thread

    Hamilcar is MINE! Heyy. We could have a civil war all by ourselves over this. ;-)


    EB DEVOTEE SINCE 2004

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO