Firstly many thanks for 1x. Its feckin awesome.....

Reading through this thread I can see no validation to this argument apart from 'I'. There is no justification apart from a lot of conjecture on an individuals opinions on events.

Now the stats could be wrong historically, but they have been set up this way over five years of development. I am sure the team have used all types of feedback and testing to reach this point.

I am sorry, but I see no argument here for the team to answer or even constructively respond to.

'I' does not equal reason.