Poll: Is EB 1.0 More Stable For You?

Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Stability Question

  1. #1
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Stability Question

    Do you think that EB 1.0 is more stable than the last iteration (.81 I think)?

    I've experienced more crashes on EB 1.0 and am wondering if this is what everyone else is getting.

    Also, if you can, post your specs just to see if certain system configs are more stable. Also, perhaps also post what type of crashes you're getting.

    Proc: E6400 @ 2.3Ghz
    RAM: 2 Gig
    GFX: 8800 GTS 320MB
    OS: Windows XP MCE

    I'm mostly getting post battle crashes about twice as often as in .81 with a noticible amount of lag.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  2. #2
    Now sporting a classic avatar! Member fallen851's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    799

    Default Re: Stability Question

    0.81av2 with all Bovi's permanent fixes was the most stable version of EB yet. When 0.72 came out, and 0.80, they were both buggy, but huge leaps in terms of content. 1.0 is no different, much more content, but buggy. Once 1.2a or whatever comes out, we can expect the bugs to be ironed out if history repeats itself.

    I have noticed EB to be more "laggy" with 1.0 than 0.81a2. The latter seemed to run quite well on my computer, with 1.0 making it struggle a bit. I'm hoping I can fix it myself, since my computer is no longer upgradable.

    I have a Dell Insprion 5100 Laptop from 2003:
    Pentium 4 2.4ghz Processor
    1 gig of Ram
    ATI Radeon 9000 Mobility 64 meg
    Windows XP SP2
    Last edited by fallen851; 10-23-2007 at 17:41.
    "It's true that when it's looked at isolated, Rome II is a good game... but every time I sit down to play it, every battle, through every turn, I see how Rome I was better. Not unanimously, but ultimately." - Dr. Sane

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6eaBtzqqFA#t=1h15m33s

  3. #3
    Stranger in a strange land Moderator Hooahguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Fortress
    Posts
    11,852

    Default Re: Stability Question

    are you kidding me???!!! its alot more stable..... at least in my case.. sorry about ur crashes.

    proc: (type- i forgot) 2.53 ghz
    RAM: 1.25 gb (soon 2 gb)
    vid card: Nvidia Geforce 5500 256 mb
    OS: Windows XP
    On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
    Visited:
    A man who casts no shadow has no soul.
    Hvil i fred HoreTore

  4. #4

    Default Re: Stability Question

    Both have been quite stable for me.
    Veni
    Vidi
    Velcro

  5. #5
    Member Member Thaatu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,117

    Default Re: Stability Question

    I still use the internal version, but even that is more stable than ever.

  6. #6
    Member Member different_13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Carlisle, England / Hillegom, the Netherlands
    Posts
    68

    Default Re: Stability Question

    I've had either one or two CTD's with 1.0.
    I had quite a few with the previous version.

    Ironically enough, my first one on 1.0 happened after I posted here praising the lack of CTD's..

  7. #7

    Default Re: Stability Question

    I had 1 CTD the entire time using 0.81v2 and so far I've had 0 using 1.0 so I don't know what all this instability mumbo jumbo is about :P
    I'm Batman!

  8. #8
    EB annoying hornet Member bovi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    11,796

    Default Re: Stability Question

    With a lot of new features there are bound to be new bugs too, including CTD ones. But we've had quite a few busy testers to find the common problems, and came to the point where we would have to release to find the rest.

    For instance, the apocalyptic disasters probably never hit in any of the games of our 10-15 testers, but when over 10000 people play, that's when these rare occurrences happen. About the Arsé oppida crash, that is among the common problems, but unfortunately we didn't get that into the build until very late in the process, so the testers didn't have the time to find it until the release.

    According to the numerous unresolved CTD issues there are a couple more things to weed out though. I'm more surprised at the huge number of people having trouble getting a working installation. All our beta testers and team members have got it working, so I didn't expect this rush.

    As a perhaps useful tidbit of information, I'll take the opportunity to post my priority list when helping out:

    1.Answering posts that can be helped with merely typing a tip, or where I ask for more information in order to begin investigation, or to help it
    2.Installation problems
    3.Reading the rest of the posts in the help forum in case there is something more belonging to the above categories
    4.Stuff that requires quick investigation to help
    5.The unresolved CTD report which is least recently posted in
    6.CTD reports that are more recently posted in

    The reason for the general order is a SJF (Shortest Job First) algorithm, while the reason for the order of the bottom two is because that's the way the forum sorts the personal stickies. Yes, it means that once someone posts in his thread the report is put in the bottom of my pile. Then again, it just might be that I've forgotten to sticky the thread, so you never know.
    Last edited by bovi; 10-24-2007 at 17:53.

    Having problems getting EB2 to run? Try these solutions.
    ================
    I do NOT answer PM requests for help with EB. Ask in a new help thread in the tech help forum.
    ================
    I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image. - Stephen Hawking

  9. #9
    Barely a levy Member overweightninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Plymouth, U.K
    Posts
    459

    Default Re: Stability Question

    I've noticed quite a few post battle CTDs, none of them seem to be recurring though and it's no big deal (snatched a couple of nice victories from me though ). To be fair though I have recently changed rigs so I can't really compare too well I suppose
    As others have said it's pretty much to be expected with the new content, hopefully some hotfixes perhaps soon

    Just to help things along:

    Athlon x64 5600
    2gb ram
    Geforce 8600GT 256mb
    Vista home premium

  10. #10
    King of the Golden Hall Member Landwalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    273

    Default Re: Stability Question

    Quote Originally Posted by overweightninja
    I've noticed quite a few post battle CTDs, none of them seem to be recurring though and it's no big deal (snatched a couple of nice victories from me though ). To be fair though I have recently changed rigs so I can't really compare too well I suppose
    As others have said it's pretty much to be expected with the new content, hopefully some hotfixes perhaps soon

    Just to help things along:

    Athlon x64 5600
    2gb ram
    Geforce 8600GT 256mb
    Vista home premium
    This has mostly happened to me as well, the post- (and occasionally pre-) battle crashes. It's ruined a great victory or two for me, but it also erased a loss to some AI rebels overrunning the garrison at Taras--when I reloaded the game, they decided not to assault that turn, and my southern legion was able to reach them and eliminate them. So I guess it cuts both ways.

    Cheers.
    "ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third."

    "ARMY, n. A class of non-producers who defend the nation by devouring everything likely to tempt an enemy to invade."
    --- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary

  11. #11

    Default Re: Stability Question

    Quote Originally Posted by overweightninja
    I've noticed quite a few post battle CTDs, none of them seem to be recurring though and it's no big deal (snatched a couple of nice victories from me though ). To be fair though I have recently changed rigs so I can't really compare too well I suppose
    As others have said it's pretty much to be expected with the new content, hopefully some hotfixes perhaps soon

    Just to help things along:

    Athlon x64 5600
    2gb ram
    Geforce 8600GT 256mb
    Vista home premium
    I too have experiences post battle CTDs. 2 thusfar and 1 during a battle, none of which repeat.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Stability Question

    So far it has been pretty stable for me, though at the start of my campaign I was plagued with more CTDs than I usually get playing EB. Probably just a random fluke though..... hopefully....

    MARMOREAM•RELINQUO•QUAM•LATERICIAM•ACCEPI

  13. #13
    Gisgo Governer of Ippone Member madmatg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    300

    Default Re: Stability Question

    mine seems to be less stable, mainly on these two parts
    1. AI turns seem to take longer with the Rebels being the longest.
    2. also my EB crashes more often than b4 maybe its because of the prety skies and water(i love them though)

    Proc: amd 3200+ 2.0ghz
    RAM: 1GH ---> soon to be 2 so i will probly check back in when i get it
    Video: 256mb nvidia 5500
    Wondows XP Home

    Phil 2:9-11 Phil 4:4

  14. #14
    Sadly not worthy of a title. Member Jurdagat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Sapmi, Norway
    Posts
    99

    Default Re: Stability Question

    I've had 4-5 CTDs.. and in every case it was after a battle strangely enough.
    But then again I've played it a lot since the release.
    Otherwise very stable for me. :)
    This is where my signature is.

  15. #15
    Member Member fatsweets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga
    Posts
    123

    Default Re: Stability Question

    The only CTD's I've had is the end turn Ctd's, which number 4 or 5. Otherwise pretty stable.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Stability Question

    Not one peep of instability to me.....game turn ends are slower.....but that may be my system....

  17. #17

    Default Re: Stability Question

    ΕΒ 1.0 is as stable to me as EB 0.8 used to be. That is I never had a CTD!
    AI turns seem to take longer though...

    Proc: intel Core2Duo 2.6 MHz
    RAM: 2 GB
    Video: 512mb ATI 2900Pro
    Windows XP Pro SP2

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO