Results 1 to 30 of 32

Thread: Why did Greek Equipment get lighter?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Pincushioned Ashigaru Member Poulp''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    464

    Default Re: Why did Greek Equipment get lighter?

    Quote Originally Posted by gurakshun
    I wonder if all peltast armies in EB (or at least 66% peltasts , 33% elite shock hoplites -NO phalanxes, they cannot support the peltasts properly-,cav support,archers[wait, are archers even necessary anymore with a peltast dominated army?]) would be a feasible idea....peltasts seem to be even more flexible than the roman legions but better in terms of cost upkeep, and requisite infrastructure. *imagines 8 or 9 units of fully armor/weapon upgraded peltasts*
    I used to run a peltast-heavy army of Numidian Javelineers playing as Numidia (it was on vanilla, mind you)
    The results were terrifying for the enemy, it's like chasing a mirage in the desert.
    And their formation was dense enough to slip through any gaps and shoot/charge from behind.

    It requires something to take care of enemy cav (jav cav) and shooters (light cav) and a mini anvil behind which the skirmishers can fall back (desert infantry)
    It requires a lot of micromanagement too.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Why did Greek Equipment get lighter?

    This happens until our days, foot soldiers are always getting more specialized and lighter in equipment and capable to deliver the same amount of destruction as the earlier heavier units
    From the markets of Lilibeo to the Sacred Band in the halls of Astarte, from those halls to the Senate of Safot Softin BiKarthadast as Lilibeo representative

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO