I thought if you used the superfaction tab, then that faction effectivley became the sentate, in all paticulars?
Also, if the answer to that is no, how many factions can be dependent on a super faction?
Thanks
I thought if you used the superfaction tab, then that faction effectivley became the sentate, in all paticulars?
Also, if the answer to that is no, how many factions can be dependent on a super faction?
Thanks
Asia ton Barbaron The new eastern mod for eb!
Laziest member of the team![]()
![]()
![]()
My red balloons, as red as the blood of he who mentioned Galatians.
Roma Victor!
Yous ee gishes?
We (at Iberia Total War) have been using the tag superfaction for many of the factions in a campaign.
The objective was to make them less expansive, and more defensive (as happens with romans_senate). It makes also some special links between the factions involved, as the "infrafaction" is not prone to attack its superfaction. Even it is possible to make a faction superfaction of itself.
However, this produces some CTD problems and other annoying questions (messages of outlaw a roman faction when it was not included in the superfaction system), probably because this tag was only designed for romans_senate, and finally we have reduced its use to the minimum.
Originally Posted by Pharnakes
you can make everyone part of the super-faction, wich again will than show that it doesnt "really" work on other factions as it does on the vanilla Romans (or cherry Romans ....) as they may end up declaring war on like the 2nd turn ... (the most important exception is the one Monkwarrior pointed out, they are less likely to attack the superfaction, but a superfaction that cant be maintained cause all subfactions declare war on each other whenever they feel like and with that break the alliances that basicly make(the feel) of the superfaction (imo))
G
Bookmarks