I also think he handled that very well.![]()
I also think he handled that very well.![]()
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
He should have inquired if she likes to take it doggiestyle first, for perfection.
handled perfectly.
he said he had no comment on the matter and she continued to press on a personal issue that is no business of anyone else....interview ends...seems reasonable.
now if only Clinton had the same reaction a couple of years ago.
"If given the choice to be the shepherd or the sheep... be the wolf"
-Josh Homme
"That's the difference between me and the rest of the world! Happiness isn't good enough for me! I demand euphoria!"
- Calvin
He made clear with his first answer he was not willing to answer such questions, and reacted appropriately when the 'reporter' refused to respect that.
"The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr
UH, he's a public leader. The press have every right to ask about his personal life. If he wanted it to remain private he shouldn't work in public office. Its ridiculous the way he responsed, and people should be incensed.
"urbani, seruate uxores: moechum caluom adducimus. / aurum in Gallia effutuisti, hic sumpsisti mutuum." --Suetonius, Life of Caesar
Maybe where you live. Here it is also 'not done' to say the least.Originally Posted by Zaknafien
Yeah - a culture-clash thing. Here, we grill them on every aspect of their personal lives. That grilling leads to many worthy candidates (e.g. Colin Powell) choosing to not run for office.Originally Posted by Fragony
Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.
Indeed, he's a public leader, yet the questions posed by the reporter had nothing to do with either half of that definition and I fail to see why he need answer such queries.Originally Posted by Zaknafien
"The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr
He handled it perfectly. The press has no right what-so-ever to ask about anyone's private life, and when he so clearly marked that he would not speak of it, asking him again is really rude. Like it's any of her business. I'd just tell her to piss off, but he politely shook her hand and left with dignity. Good for him.
I don't think it would be acceptable if a British Prime Minister were repeatedly asked about their divorce. But then again - may be the fear of such an interrogation is why parties nowadays make sure their leaders are - apparently - happily married.
The other aspect is that the French President is the Head of State. I think the symbolic aspect of that role requires some additional distance that the French President maintained effectively here.
At first I thought you were being sarcastic, until I realized that you weren't. That is dead wrong and is full of crap, people's private lives are private, period, no matter what their job is. I could care less if the mayor of my city is really a cross dressing furry with a fetish for I Love Lucy lookalikes, that's his/her own private business, so long as they do their job well and appropriately. Spare us the nonsense about public scrutiny and being 'examples' in advance.Originally Posted by Zaknafien
Unless it was a hypocritical stance. Such as a mayor who campaigned against transvestites and red heads.Originally Posted by Whacker
Bookmarks