Results 1 to 30 of 40

Thread: Alexanders choice of conquest.

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #29
    Bruadair a'Bruaisan Member cmacq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Where on this beige, brown, and olive-drab everything will stick, sting, bite, and/or eat you; most rickety-tick.
    Posts
    6,160

    Default Re: Alexanders choice of conquest.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bootsiuv
    Anyways, weren't the macedonians thought to be of the same descent of the 'dorian' greeks who overthrew mycanaean (sp) culture c. 1200 BC i.e. the athenians and makedons would have shared some blood ties....as the athenians were 'barbarians' from the north a 1000 years prior.
    Just curious....
    similar Doric dialect, far different history. On the other hand the athenians spoke the Attic dialect which is part of the Ionic tradition, and were to some extent a very mixed bag, but overall more related to the Achaeans and some non-greek speakers. At least five kinds of classical greeks.


    Pelasgian greeks
    Non- greek-greeks (this group may in fact represent several discrete ethnos, within itself?)

    Dorian greeks ...crete, peloponnesus
    Including northwest Greece and Macedonia

    Thessalian-Aeolic greeks

    Ionic-Attic greeks

    Arkadian greeks

    Arcado-cypriot greeks

    After MA we have development of a common greek ethnos and language, koine, which slowly replaced other dialects, yet i think some form of dorian greek is still used?

    The strange thing is... if i remember right, greek as a language is considered closely related to Indo-Iranian types.
    Last edited by cmacq; 11-01-2007 at 00:22.
    quae res et cibi genere et cotidiana exercitatione et libertate vitae

    Herein events and rations daily birth the labors of freedom.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO