Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Popularis

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Popularis

    Something definitely changed compared to 0.81. Optimates and Populares are much more seldom now.

    When I finally found a character that had the trait, I sent him campaigning to get the command stars and I made him the faction heir to get the influence and consul trait. With all the requirements in place I rechecked - and now he had lost the Populares trait!

    I rechecked all my other family members and couldn't find a single Populares, so I edited the trait file and removed the Populares requirement. Badabing!

    cheers/EoE

  2. #2
    EB annoying hornet Member bovi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    11,796

    Default Re: Popularis

    As in 0.8x, build temples of Ceres to increase the chances of them being popularis.

    Edit: Bah, I'm slow.

    Having problems getting EB2 to run? Try these solutions.
    ================
    I do NOT answer PM requests for help with EB. Ask in a new help thread in the tech help forum.
    ================
    I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image. - Stephen Hawking

  3. #3

    Default Re: Popularis

    Hm, that might explain it. Most of my faction characters are gens Cornelia though I do my damndest to accept other gens when offered.

    rgds/EoE

  4. #4

    Default Re: Popularis

    Speaking of the Marian reforms, I think the time for them is unnecessarily prolonged by not having them trigger until 170 BC. It would be a better experience if reforms were possible earlier as long as the other conditions are met. With the player as Rome expansion is practically always going to happen at an unhistorical pace. With no hope of having reforms earlier in response to the expansion I can't help but feeling punished as a player for doing well.

  5. #5
    EB TRIBVNVS PLEBIS Member MarcusAureliusAntoninus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The State of Jefferson, USA
    Posts
    5,722

    Default Re: Popularis

    172BC already is early. In EB v0.7x, you had to wait until 107BC. I'm pretty sure there will be no official moving of the reform to sooner.


  6. #6

    Default Re: Popularis

    I edited the script myself to remove the time-condition, so I could get the reform whenever the other conditions were met. And I don't consider this cheating as I think the reforms should be possible whenever a set of certain conditions is met, irregardless of the time being. Unless offcourse the time itself plays an important role. But in this case, I consider the other trigers more important (the latifundia, the reformator-character, the number of provinces). This is certainly true because the expansion as player for Roma, always goes faster the it did historically.

  7. #7
    Whatever Member konny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Germania Inferior
    Posts
    1,787

    Default Re: Popularis

    Quote Originally Posted by Lucasiewicz
    Unless offcourse the time itself plays an important role.
    Not that much. The Cimbri invasion played a role, but the reforms could have been triggred by another event or another character living a generation early or later as well. I think the time is implemented because the reforms of the other factions are also (partly) triggered by the time elapsed.

    In EB 0.8 I had changed the Romans reforms to be triggered by the number of provinces only. That might make it easyer for the AI to get them - but could also mean that the Romans are stacked in the Camillan Periode for ever, if they don't make it out of Italy.

    Disclaimer: my posts are to be considered my private opinion and not offical statements by the EB Team

  8. #8

    Default Re: Popularis

    Quote Originally Posted by Lucasiewicz
    I edited the script myself to remove the time-condition, so I could get the reform whenever the other conditions were met. And I don't consider this cheating as I think the reforms should be possible whenever a set of certain conditions is met, irregardless of the time being. Unless offcourse the time itself plays an important role. But in this case, I consider the other trigers more important (the latifundia, the reformator-character, the number of provinces). This is certainly true because the expansion as player for Roma, always goes faster the it did historically.
    Well, the societal factors did play some role as well. My understanding is that aristocratic appropriation of more and more land created more and more disgruntled poor people, especially from around the middle of the second century BC. These poor people allowed people like Tiberius Gracchus to press for reforms; he ended up on the receiving end of a senator's club, but was still succeeded by his brother fighting for the same cause. That led to the killing of some 3,000 people, but the social unrest continued. When an entire Roman legion embarassingly surrendered to the Numidians in 112 BC, the dissatisfaction with the senate reached a new high, and Gaius Marius used the popular sentiment to gain the power of consul. The rest is history.

    So social unrest and weaknesses in the senate were important factors. As a matter of fact, they were important in the transformation of Rome into an empire as well.
    Veni
    Vidi
    Velcro

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO