ALEXANDER EB

[Maksimus]

ifaster, acccording to everything i've been hearing

It is, its just that EB is one really advanced game anyway

do i really really need all these fixes? permanent fixes? temporary fixes? and even optional fixes? why don't you just include them?

There is one fix that is not included into the mod - ''pack'' and it is about 50mgb - so If we include it in.. then.. you konw, that is + 50mgb

[QUOTE=Danzifuge]sorry about the complaining but i've been really frustrated about getting this thing to work. and you really need to organize and clarify your installation instruction a bit better (like don't hide them and separate the installation instructions of the transition files from the beta files) and explain the two a bit better.

and btw HOLY SHIT. the starting armies aint no joke no more. I'm about to piss my pants cuz pyrrhos has three elephant units sitting next to pella. also, whats the point in giving me 20k mnai if i'm going to lose all but 2k after the first turn due to some huge army upkeep. i can disband nearly all my troops but garrisons and i probably will still end up in the red and conquered by pyrrhos too. the point is you seem to have increased the population size but the income per city still doesnt seem to be quite enough to match the increased costs of armies. in fact, you've just widened the gap between an affordable garrison and absolute bankruptcy that was present in vanilla eb.

Macedonia is especially hard to play, + after a 2 turns you will lose at least 30% of your army because of Pyrr and Athenai... But overall we will increasse income for the finall

For some factions, you are not in that hard debt as with Makedonia. The point is you now have army that is capable of taking Athens and fight Pyrr.. It is your call if you want to take Greece or not - but you will lose many troops after first couple of turns anyway..

otherwise very elegant and diverse units (haven't played alexander yet) but they fit in nicely.

I should suggest more coz we will take into account that