ALEXANDER EB

[Maksimus]

I don't like idea of sharing barracks between different cultures (honestly, i don't like any idea which intentionally makes life easier for human players). And remember, that using/building barracks is an abstraction, no way real-life conquerors can recruit their core troops immediately upon conquest of predominately different culture territory, it takes years to migrate enough military settlers in (or convert loyal locals to conqueror's customs). I believe long building times represent these difficulties well.

No.. no.. greeks-greeks barbs-barbs it's just that Getai were an example.. anyway's - they have only possibility of usin 2 Unit's no matter what! And the point is that Celt's for example don't have a bonus of Royal Barracks in Seleucidia at all or in Pella or Athenai - the celt's just don't even have an option to raise any army in greece - exept regional - and that needs to be build

And cultures don't share as such.. they just 'use' ones barracks and can't upgrade them .. like in the cases in history when Nikator killed Thracian King and took Thracian army - and then Ptolomy son kiled Seleucid in a tent and then took the same thracian army and made himself a king of Macedon.. just after he came from Asia Minor into Greece and that army was still fighting after that for Pyrros I think..
And Gonatas had problems when his army left him just before the finall fight agains Pyrros - the whole Macedonian army just swiched sides! And made Pyrros their king.. and after Pyrros was dead they went back to Gonatas..

There are proofs for this..

Anyway.. the game is even harder for the player with this army system.. when AI could use some enemies barracks - but see, the point is to make Less Army and Royal barracks as a result - that way the chances for retraining options by human would be 0 or +1

YOU SHOULD LOOK on the Recruitment Viewer

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=93502