Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Playing Battles on Medium

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Playing Battles on Medium

    Does anyone find playing battles on medium difficulty too easy? I won nearly all battles, not counting naval engagements. I think AI needs a little boost, playing on Very hard can be almost impossible, but playing hard i found a nice balance. I when about 60-75% of battle, and sometimes get my ass handed to me, and sometimes pull a stunning upset. I find it much more fun with a challenge. Does everyone follow the recommended very hard campaign and medium battle? or some go with VH-H or even VH-VH?

  2. #2
    Asia ton Barbaron mapper Member Pharnakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Kingdom of Fife
    Posts
    1,768

    Default Re: Playing Battles on Medium

    People do go as high as VH, VH, Neospartan in paticular is well know for his obstinate mausculinity in this.

    Personaly, when I finnaly get my EB1.0 working, I will try playing on HH with fatigue off, as those who have tried this says the AI a chance, and gives the battles more importance in your campaign, as the are no longer garaunteed-insta wins.
    Asia ton Barbaron The new eastern mod for eb!

    Laziest member of the team My red balloons, as red as the blood of he who mentioned Galatians.
    Roma Victor!

    Yous ee gishes?

  3. #3
    Combustion Member beatoangelico's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    279

    Default Re: Playing Battles on Medium

    after my baktria campaign I would like to try a H/H one, I've already started a VH/M with the Romani, I'd like to see what is more balanced and challenging.
    VH in battles can be quite frustrating even in vanilla TW so I don't bother for trying it in EB.
    Last edited by beatoangelico; 11-11-2007 at 20:01.

  4. #4
    Guest Dayve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,659

    Default Re: Playing Battles on Medium

    I don't like battles on anything above medium... I like to zoom in and watch the action a lot, i like to let the lines thin before charging my cavalry around like madmen. On hard you can't do that, as soon as combat starts it's a frustrating click-fest. I would like to feel as though every battle counts in the mod, but it can never happen. Not because of EB... EB is the best R:TW can ever be, it won't get better than this, it's just the way the game was shipped, battles have no importance unless you're playing as Hayasdan or something equally as insanely difficult.

    Even on VH/VH if you suffer a crushing defeat, what then? You raise a new army and go at it again. What happens if you get a heroic victory and destroy a powerful AI army? He raises a new one and sends it straight at you. At the end of it all, it turns out just as it would on VH/M.

    Mind you, i did suffer rather a devastating loss today as Epeiros. I had Phyrros as my general with his 5 stars, a good army, trouble is i was facing 2 Makedonian armies with a 7 star general. Thanks to Sinhuet's formation modifications the AI actually tied up all of my units and then attacked my phalanxes from behing leaving me absolutely no choice but to sit and watch them be slaughtered.

    So you see, VH/M doesn't always go the way you want it.

  5. #5
    Professional Lurker Member Bava's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Somewhere with a cold Augustiner in my hands
    Posts
    360

    Default Re: Playing Battles on Medium

    Medium+Generals camera+Fatigue off= very exciting battles
    "Well, whenever I'm confused, I just check my underwear. It holds the answer to all the important questions." - Grandpa Simpson

  6. #6
    Peerless Senior Member johnhughthom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Looking for the red blob of nothingness
    Posts
    6,344

    Default Re: Playing Battles on Medium

    Quote Originally Posted by Bava
    Medium+Generals camera+Fatigue off= very exciting battles
    Add in using a faction with foot generals and you got a good challenge.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Playing Battles on Medium

    Quote Originally Posted by Pharnakes
    People do go as high as VH, VH, Neospartan in paticular is well know for his obstinate mausculinity in this.
    ....
    Thanks Pharnakes!

    Yep M is TOO easy. And Yes FATIGE OFF make battles WAY more fun since the AI doesn't tire its troops by running around.

    HOWEVER, M with Fatige Off makes for really fun strick roleplaying games. So if you are into heavy roleplaying (usually with the Romani) then M with Fatige Off is best.

    I've heard general camare is a good challange, I want to try it, but since I like watching my men fight from different angles and look at the scenery (like a mental screen shot) I can't bring myself to use it.

    Now when you are NOT roleplaying Vh or H is best, depending on how much "unfair" u want to fight against the AI (bridges, high cliffs, etc) and depending on the faction ur playing too. (Aedui, Pontus, Hyastan [sp], etc are almost imposible in Vh, take fatige off and it can be imposible)


    There is one thing I would like to point out about EB 1.0 that happens in the Western part of the map (not so sure about the east). The Eleutheroi are pretty strong, Rome won't get out of Italy intil 250some, its 228 and Sweboz have yet to break out of Central Europe. Also the Boii have a SUPER stack right around that town, and other Alpine celts have stacks protecting the towns. So... that has held up the AI expansion and my expansion.

    (currently VH/H with Fatige Off, a little bit of roleplaying with no bridge battles, no high cliffs unless utterly outnumbered, and taking my time. As: Aedui )

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO