Results 1 to 30 of 60

Thread: Your choice of faction: a "rational" explanation

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Your choice of faction: a "rational" explanation

    I truly love Epeiros because of being clammered between Italy and mainland Greece. Not to mention you can go pretty much whatever direction you want with your campaign because Pyrrhus suffered from massive assault ADD. After you go a little crazy with Pyrrhus and he dies you can use his sons to consolidate an empire and then become king of Greece as Alexander did. Although this is the case I have played a Makedonian campaign and am currently undertaking Arche Seleukia which up to this point has been somewhat boring as I am just trying to develop all this scattered land and bouncing around rebels. The only conquering I've done is I blitzed Ptolemai off of Asia minor except for Side which I just took about 10 minutes ago. Despite building mines everywhere I could and 3 very large mines I can barely compensate for the corruption which is realisitc but sad! Also I haven't been partaking in much conquest because I hate marrying and adopting and naturally diluting the family tree so I had to wait about 60 turns to get some generals and governors. God bless EB.
    I'm Batman!

  2. #2
    King of the Golden Hall Member Landwalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    273

    Default Re: Your choice of faction: a "rational" explanation

    Hmmm.... I followed Watchman's instructions, and they worked like a charm... until Mowg came of age. Although my starting generals (and the Eleutheroi counterparts) were all Rycalawre, all my generals who come of age are... African Generals...? Given that I didn't change anything (aside from the differences between Watchman's Rycalawre and the 1.0 version), this seems passing strange.

    Aside from that, having decent generals, even of the infantry variety, has already made the Casse much more enjoyable.

    Cheers.
    "ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third."

    "ARMY, n. A class of non-producers who defend the nation by devouring everything likely to tempt an enemy to invade."
    --- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary

  3. #3
    Whatever Member konny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Germania Inferior
    Posts
    1,787

    Default Re: Your choice of faction: a "rational" explanation

    Quote Originally Posted by Landwalker
    Hmmm.... I followed Watchman's instructions, and they worked like a charm... until Mowg came of age. Although my starting generals (and the Eleutheroi counterparts) were all Rycalawre, all my generals who come of age are... African Generals...? Given that I didn't change anything (aside from the differences between Watchman's Rycalawre and the 1.0 version), this seems passing strange.
    It looks like you have moved the entry down the list: FM that come of age always get the first bodyguard that is assigned to their faction, what would be the African General if there is no factional bodyguard assigned before.

    I am sorry for bumping this old thread, but I wanted to do it myself and had search for the instruction.

    Disclaimer: my posts are to be considered my private opinion and not offical statements by the EB Team

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO