Results 1 to 30 of 40

Thread: Which sucks more: Private health insurance or socialized medicine?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Sovereign Oppressor Member TIE Fighter Shooter Champion, Turkey Shoot Champion, Juggler Champion Kralizec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,812

    Default Re: Which sucks more: Private health insurance or socialized medicine?

    They never heard of "poverty trap" in Washington?

  2. #2
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: Which sucks more: Private health insurance or socialized medicine?

    I'd prefer a system of pay-as-you-go general healthcare supported by charities for the poorest and then sensible insurance for emergency and long-term care.

    I'd rather see government mandated HSAs before socialized medicine. The way to better healthcare is to get patients to care about service and cost, not to further remove them from them.
    Everyone agrees that far too many Americans lack health insurance. But covering the uninsured comes about as a byproduct of getting other things right. The real danger is that our national obsession with universal coverage will lead us to neglect reforms — such as enacting a standard health insurance deduction, expanding health savings accounts and deregulating insurance markets — that could truly expand coverage, improve quality and make care more affordable.

    As H. L. Mencken said: "For every problem, there is a solution that is simple, elegant, and wrong." Universal healthcare is a textbook case.
    link
    Last edited by Xiahou; 11-14-2007 at 05:21.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  3. #3
    The Black Senior Member Papewaio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    15,677

    Default Re: Which sucks more: Private health insurance or socialized medicine?

    Where do vaccines go?

    User pays or the broad population? After all who is the beneficiary of vaccines... just the user or having enough to create moats of immunity.

    The economic benefit of having a healthy working age population is fairly obvious . What is often missed is the economic benefits of having a healthy elderly population... so who should pay then?
    Our genes maybe in the basement but it does not stop us chosing our point of view from the top.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
    Pape for global overlord!!
    Quote Originally Posted by English assassin
    Squid sources report that scientists taste "sort of like chicken"
    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    The rest is either as average as advertised or, in the case of the missionary, disappointing.

  4. #4
    Guardian of the Fleet Senior Member Shahed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Leading the formation!
    Posts
    7,918

    Default Re: Which sucks more: Private health insurance or socialized medicine?

    Smoking, drinking, fast foods, processed foods, etc. All this contributes to an unhealthy elderly population. To take care of them the state pays i.e taxpayer pays. I'm not saying we should'nt do it, I'm saying more could be done to ensure a healthier elderly population.
    If you remember me from M:TW days add me on Steam, do mention your org name.

    http://www.steamcommunity.com/id/__shak

  5. #5
    Mafia Hunter Member Kommodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    In a top-secret lab planning world domination
    Posts
    1,286

    Default Re: Which sucks more: Private health insurance or socialized medicine?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sinan
    Smoking, drinking, fast foods, processed foods, etc. All this contributes to an unhealthy elderly population. To take care of them the state pays i.e taxpayer pays. I'm not saying we should'nt do it, I'm saying more could be done to ensure a healthier elderly population.
    I'm sure this isn't exactly a new idea, but perhaps we should impose large sales taxes on fast food like we do on tobacco? I mean, fast food is popular in part because it is quick and cheap. If people had to pay as much for fast food as they did for healthier food, maybe the healthier options could better compete!

    Now I'm off to Wendy's...
    If you define cowardice as running away at the first sign of danger, screaming and tripping and begging for mercy, then yes, Mr. Brave man, I guess I'm a coward. -Jack Handey

  6. #6

    Default Re: Which sucks more: Private health insurance or socialized medicine?

    A danger in the public health care system is that the government could then justify passing laws that limit our liberty in order to "keep us safe and healthy". Kind of like motorcycle helmet laws, but worse.

    No fatty foods! No smoking of any kind anywhere ever! These are the entry level possibilities, but imagine how far the tyrants of congress could take it. After all, we don't really elect anyone in this country. We elect from the pool of crap that they give us.
    "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Einstein

    Quote Originally Posted by Pannonian View Post
    The Backroom is the Crackroom.

  7. #7
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Which sucks more: Private health insurance or socialized medicine?

    How about.... Private clinics, but the state pays?
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  8. #8
    Grand Patron's Banner Bearer Senior Member Peasant Phill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Somewhere relatively safe, behind some one else, preferably at the back
    Posts
    2,953
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Which sucks more: Private health insurance or socialized medicine?

    The key to to a good social or socialized health care system is IMO the quality of the hospitals and medical staff. The problem most people have with social (public) health care is the poor quality it provides in comparison to private health care. Long waiting time, less competent medical staff, worse equipment, ... This is, however, not inherent to a social health care system itself. Belgium for example is a benchmark on the matter of health care and is a social health care system.

    The biggest problem IMO is the capitalism in health care. Private hospitals have more resources than public hospitals due to low governmental funding (in comparison to other countries). Private hospitals can then 'buy' the best medical staff. Doing so lowers the quality of public hospitals.
    One should lower the average wages of medical staff to the point that public hospitals can afford to rival or at least approach private hospitals. I'm aware that this is unimaginable in the USA but I think that is the best (cost/effectiev) way to improve health care in general: the price will drop, comfort will rise and more people will have access to better health care.
    Quote Originally Posted by Drone
    Someone has to watch over the wheat.
    Quote Originally Posted by TinCow
    We've made our walls sufficiently thick that we don't even hear the wet thuds of them bashing their brains against the outer wall and falling as lifeless corpses into our bottomless moat.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO