Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Is this cheating?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    EB TRIBVNVS PLEBIS Member MarcusAureliusAntoninus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The State of Jefferson, USA
    Posts
    5,722

    Default Re: Is this cheating?

    As for the OP, I wouldn't say that is cheating. However, if you feel it is an exploit, you can make a house rule about not doing it to make things more of a challenge.

    For the bridge battles, that really isn't a cheat either, but I try to avoid it. Sometimes I will purposely do it, though. Like when an enemy won't stop sending stacks after me and I just want to end the war. It is a whole lot easier to not have to fight a real battle every single turn.


  2. #2
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: Is this cheating?

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusAureliusAntoninus
    As for the OP, I wouldn't say that is cheating. However, if you feel it is an exploit, you can make a house rule about not doing it to make things more of a challenge.

    For the bridge battles, that really isn't a cheat either, but I try to avoid it. Sometimes I will purposely do it, though. Like when an enemy won't stop sending stacks after me and I just want to end the war. It is a whole lot easier to not have to fight a real battle every single turn.
    As for fighting multiple stacks, when I encounter so many enemy stacks, sometimes I listen to some music/read a book and "mostly" let the battle run by itself...if I suffer huge casualties then so be it, it's more realistic that way since you can be expected to win every battle with minimal loses (due to AI's stupidity).
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  3. #3

    Default Re: Is this cheating?

    i lost a bridge battle once :(

  4. #4
    Member Member Intranetusa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    1,247

    Default Re: Is this cheating?

    Quote Originally Posted by runes
    i lost a bridge battle once :(
    Fo shame! The only honorable course left for you to take is to fall upon your own sword!
    "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind...but there is one thing that science cannot accept - and that is a personal God who meddles in the affairs of his creation."
    -Albert Einstein




  5. #5
    Whatever Member konny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Germania Inferior
    Posts
    1,787

    Default Re: Is this cheating?

    Quote Originally Posted by runes
    i lost a bridge battle once :(
    Me too,twice. And that was not in one of the earliest games that made in EB.

    In the first incident I had hired a unit of Merc Iphikratians as phalanx because I had none of myself around. That didn't do, Iphikratians are whatsoever but no real phalanx.

    The second was a result of AI spamming elites: When 6 units of naked fanatics want to cross a bridge, there is nothing that can stop them from doing so.

    Disclaimer: my posts are to be considered my private opinion and not offical statements by the EB Team

  6. #6
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Is this cheating?

    Regarding the OP, meh. Lightning sorties aiming to destroy the attacker's siege equipement and therefore factual ability to actually storm the fortress were very much par for the course historically. Heck, fortresses typically enough had purpose-built sally ports for the job, and canny defenders sometimes made holes in their own walls to mount a surprise attack... Granted they weren't usually done in the middle of an assault, but RTW sieges are somewhat abstract anyway.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO