.
Most of the Paleologi nobility with the potential of claiming the throne were executed and there needn't be any romantic reasons for that beyond the cold reality.But a certain Andreas Paleologos (possibly among others) survived, converted and became Ahmed Paşa (which Ahmed Paşa? I have to check. He had a prothet.) Well, I've just remembered another one: Has Murad Paşa, killed in the Otlukbeli battle against Uzun Hasan Pâdişah of the Akkoyunlu was also a Paleologos.
What I remember of Giustiniani is a bit different. He was a Renaissance type of guy with ideals (alongside his mercenary profession) and grew some kind of adoration for the falling Vasileas, which was among the reasons for him not to leave while most others did and the Genoese of Galata switched sides quickly under the table.
Mehmed wanted the crown for himself and he indeed got it. The clergy was already divided and the zealous Orthodox faction easily styled the newcomer as the new Vasileas. That continued to the end. Solid evidence from as earliest as 1904 remains on the plaque at the door of a Catholic church in Pera. (I remember jotting down names of some of those men of cloak somewhere...)
The Komneni of Pontos were initially luckier. In 1461 when the ragtag emperor (was it Manuil?) surrendered without resistance, he and his sons were given fiefs (dirlik) in Bulgaria. One of his three (four?) sons converted. A few years later, a conspiracy much similar to Mary Stuart's cost their lives (including the convert prinkeps). Historians tend to believe it was Mahmud Paşa the grand vizier's doing and they were innocent. Nevertheless, Mahmud Paşa lost his head to a conspiracy not much later and he was also innocent on the account that he had been accused to death.
PS: I'm not sure if it was ΔΡΑΓΑΖΗΣ or ΔΡΑΓΑΣΗΣ so don't be hasty in changing your signature.
.
Bookmarks