Results 1 to 30 of 49

Thread: Is there a 'realistic' use for mercenaries?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Is there a 'realistic' use for mercenaries?

    If I have a choice I dont use mercenaries for suicidal missions.
    They are very expensive to replace but are not expensive to upkeep.
    From financial point of view it doesnt make sense to hire mercenaries and annihilate them in first battle.
    That said it had happened few times. But I just didnt have a choice.
    You just cant assault city with hors army.
    Last edited by LorDBulA; 11-20-2007 at 18:13.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Is there a 'realistic' use for mercenaries?

    Quote Originally Posted by LorDBulA
    If I have a choice I dont use mercenaries for suicidal missions.
    They are very expensive to replace but are not expensive to upkeep.
    From financial point of view it doesnt make sense to hire mercenaries and annihilate them in first battle.
    That said it had happened few times. But I just didnt have a choice.
    You just cant assault city with horse army.
    agreed.
    in any battle i fight i throw them in only if absolutely nessecary, otherwise they are kept as reserves (in most cases).
    main reasons they are so valuble to me -
    1. they are very expensive to hire anew.
    2. you cant retrain them in most cases.
    3. like said above, they can fill the gap in what otherwise just isnt your faction's strong point.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO