Well this is one way to look at it (Originally Posted by Husar
) and yes it lacks originality on his part given the history, however it dosent negate the fact that religion was used in a formal debate format.
In the context of the debate, CR certainly made a point with a decent reference to a popular mythos, but its still an infrence to something that isnt based on a fact. That makes it a valid critique IMHO.
However in reflection, perhaps it would be better to have a formal rebutall thread to debates after they have occurred with Sigurd presiding.
Bookmarks