Yes, games.Originally Posted by Blodrast
![]()
You know, MTW ran slower than STW, yet it was shinier.![]()
Yes, games.Originally Posted by Blodrast
![]()
You know, MTW ran slower than STW, yet it was shinier.![]()
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
Nope, comparing apples and oranges here, MTW had new features, improved stability, etc. With Vista it is the other way around over XP, for example.Originally Posted by Husar
I personally do not consider MTW to have been worse than STW, which is what I was asking about. If you liked STW better, that's a different story, we weren't talking about _liking_, but about _worse_.
Therapy helps, but screaming obscenities is cheaper.
If I had partitioning software, I'd dump Vista faster than an ex with syphilis and dual-boot to XP.
foolish, but...Originally Posted by Kekvit Irae
From wise men, O Lord, protect us -anon
The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of millions, a statistic -Stalin
We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area -UK military spokesman Major Mike Shearer
I personally do not consider Vista to be worse than XP either, for me it runs stable, has more features and looks better. Before I just mentioned that it may be slower, but my point was that slower does not necessarily equal worse.Originally Posted by Blodrast
I'm sorry if it doesn't work for someone but I am not going to run around screaming that it crashes when it doesn't for me.
When a game or demo crashes it also seems to handle that better than XP in my experience. Maybe I magically acquired a fixed version or it's the tradeoff for me having no girlfriend, but my experience with Vista is that it's better than XP except for the compatibility.![]()
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
Bookmarks