When I'm playing EB or MTW2, I like to keep an eye on factions that are bulking up. Don't wanna get caught by a zerg rush with nothing but spear militia, ya know?
Since the end of the Cold War, most of the world’s militaries have downsized. But in recent years, a few countries have been bulking up. In this week’s List, FP takes a look at the countries that are going large while everyone else is slimming down.
People’s Republic of China
Annual military budget: $103.9 billion (2005 estimate)
What they’re spending on: Weapons and military technology. Between 2002 and 2006, China purchased over $14.6 billion in arms. Between 2001 and 2005, China increased its annual military budget by nearly 126 percent. In addition to buying a few destroyers and submarines from Russia, China has also been developing its own nuclear-powered submarines that can fire off nuclear ballistic missiles. At its current rate of military expansion, China could have the world’s largest navy by 2020. Earlier this year, the Chinese also performed an unannounced test of a new antisatellite missile that drew fierce criticism from the United States and the international community.
What to watch: Boots on the ground. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA), with 2.25 million active-duty members, is the largest army in the world. But as large as its active-duty forces are, the Chinese military has decreased in size in the past two decades by more than 1.6 million soldiers. The reduction has allowed the Chinese military to use its increased budget to focus on training, leaving the force smaller and more professional.
Why it matters: The Taiwan Strait. China is determined to use its new wealth to modernize its armed forces, and a possible battle with the United States over Taiwan is the main motivating factor.
United States of America
Annual military budget: $481.4 billion (FY 2008 estimate)
What they’re spending on: Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which have cost U.S. taxpayers about $610 billion since Sept. 11, 2001. Then there are global antiterrorism measures, missile shields, personnel expenditures, and advanced defense technologies such as the next-generation aircraft carrier and unmanned aerial vehicles. The result: U.S. defense spending increased 54 percent this year over 2001—excluding the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
What to watch: Emergency spending and plans to grow the Army. Since the war on terror began, emergency supplemental packages have been tacked on to normal defense spending, putting vast expenses beyond normal congressional review. Just this year, President George W. Bush requested nearly $200 billion extra for Iraq and Afghanistan through next year—on top of the normal defense budget of $481.4 billion. There are also plans in the works for increasing the size of the U.S. Army by 74,000 soldiers by 2010, a project estimated to require an additional $2.6 billion per year.
Why it matters: Overextension. Iraq and Afghanistan are straining the U.S. military’s global operations. Increased funding and more troops is the only way the United States can maintain its forces in the “global war on terrorism” while still preparing conventional defenses against potential future adversaries.
Republic of South Africa
Annual military budget: $3.69 billion (2005 estimate)
What they’re spending on: Weapons and military readiness. The military budget increased 102 percent between 2001 and 2005, mainly for arms and other military equipment. The country spent virtually nothing on imported arms in 2003 and 2004, but it acquired $315 million worth of weapons and equipment in 2005 and a further $862 million in 2006. South Africa has also gotten help from the United States in the form of technical training assistance, funds for aircraft parts, and military medical training.
What to watch: Peacekeeping. The African Union has plans for five regional rapid deployment forces ready for use by 2010, and South Africa is spearheading the effort with a unit that could involve as many as 10,000 soldiers. South African peacekeepers are currently deployed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, and Darfur.
Why it matters: Regional stability. As befits sub-Saharan Africa’s largest economy, South Africa wants to be the military powerhouse of the region. However, a 2002 report revealed that only 3,000 of the country’s 76,000 active-duty soldiers could be deployed for combat operations due to inadequate equipment and the fact that as many as 60 percent of the country’s soldiers could be infected with HIV.
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
Annual military budget: $1.67 billion (2005 estimate)
What they’re spending on: AKs. Venezuela’s international arms purchases jumped from an estimated $71 million between 2002 and 2004 to more than $4 billion between 2005 and 2007, expenditures not counted in the official budget numbers. Venezuela purchased 100,000 Kalashnikovs from Russia last year, along with 24 fighter jets and 35 helicopters. And a new Kalashnikov factory in Aragua state, capable of producing as many as 30,000 automatic rifles a year, is scheduled to be completed by 2010.
What to watch: The militias. Although President Hugo Chávez has not increased the country’s overall active troop strength, he has founded two public militia groups in addition to the country’s regular National Reserve: the Francisco de Miranda Front (FFM) in 2003 and the Territorial Guard in 2005. As of mid-2006, the FFM had around 10,000 members and the National Reserve and Territorial Guard together were around 2 million strong. Combined, this “people’s army” is officially meant to defend against such unlikely events as an attempted invasion by the United States, which Chávez claims is imminent. Critics say the groups are being used to suppress internal dissent, however.
Why it matters: It could destabilize neighboring countries. Chávez isn’t just arming people in his own country; he’s also giving aid and arms to “revolutionary” groups in Colombia. Analysts worry that weapons from Venezuela will make their way over the border to leftist FARC rebels in that country. Chávez also has close ties to Evo Morales. In May 2006, the Bolivian president agreed to construct as many as 24 new military bases in Bolivia with Venezuelan assistance—despite objections from Chile, Paraguay, and Peru.
Republic of India
Annual military budget: $21.7 billion (2005)
What they’re spending on: Everything. India is the world’s No. 2 arms importer after China, shelling out more than $10 billion on arms imports between 2002 and 2006. Its defense spending has jumped 53 percent since 2001.
What to watch: Its reserve forces. In addition to the country’s 1.3 million active troops, India has more than doubled its reserves since 2001 to 1.1 million additional soldiers.
Why it matters: It’s a sign of intentions. With growing threats of instability in neighboring Pakistan, a continuing conflict in Kashmir, and military modernization in China, not to mention a simmering Maoist insurgency, India may just be responding to what it sees as gathering dangers. Expect greater defense spending and international arms purchases in the future.
Interesting article, but why are South Africa and Venezuela even on that list, they have 100 times less budget than USA, and 25 times smaller than China... Only USA and China have anything worth worrying about, possibly India too. But another interesting aspect that is also forgotten above is the future potential capability of defense spending. Western Europe could probably theoretically increase its military budget maybe 10 times for instance... And perhaps China could too... Who knows where the real danger are? And it also doesn't take into account North Korea's nukes, which makes them a greater danger even if they don't spend as much on regular weaponry.
Under construction...
"In countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Norway, there is no separation of church and state." - HoreTore
Why should we care? Only one of these countries are on the map, and we won't see them until very late, so we should be in full control of europe and with a massive army when we encounter them.
This may change in empires though...
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Interesting article, but why are South Africa and Venezuela even on that list, they have 100 times less budget than USA, and 25 times smaller than China... Only USA and China have anything worth worrying about, possibly India too. But another interesting aspect that is also forgotten above is the future potential capability of defense spending. Western Europe could probably theoretically increase its military budget maybe 10 times for instance... And perhaps China could too... Who knows where the real danger are? And it also doesn't take into account North Korea's nukes, which makes them a greater danger even if they don't spend as much on regular weaponry.
It isnt how much they are spending, it is how much they are spending in relation to surrounding countries. China is a major threat for obvious reasons. At the moment, neighboring nations are also spending massive amounts of money on arms. This gives us both concern and solace as China can be contained regionally but are still creating an arms race that could lead to something terrible for everybody.
Venezuela is scary because their expenditures contrast with the low amounts of other South American nations. Coupled with his obvious agenda to revolutionize the continent and destabilize surrounding centrist or right wing governments, a relatively vast military plan is a very bad thing for regional stability. I think surrounding nations are starting to see this. It seems to me that Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador are forging some sort of military alliance while aggressively undermining government in places like Columbia, etc.
"That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
-Eric "George Orwell" Blair
"If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
(Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Interesting article, but why are South Africa and Venezuela even on that list, they have 100 times less budget than USA, and 25 times smaller than China... Only USA and China have anything worth worrying about, possibly India too. But another interesting aspect that is also forgotten above is the future potential capability of defense spending. Western Europe could probably theoretically increase its military budget maybe 10 times for instance... And perhaps China could too... Who knows where the real danger are? And it also doesn't take into account North Korea's nukes, which makes them a greater danger even if they don't spend as much on regular weaponry.
My dear boy if you're worried about US intentions toward Europe be aware that we already have tens of thousands of troops stationed there. Their presence is the reason why Europe doesn't increase it's defense budget 10 fold. That's assuming they could if they wanted to. Look at what the Brits are doing to their armed forces. It's a shame to see the royal navy in such poor shape.
Reinvent the British and you get a global finance center, edible food and better service. Reinvent the French and you may just get more Germans.
Faction Check
Reply With Quote
Re: Faction Check
Originally Posted by Rodion Romanovich
Bookmarks