Kervanos is wright here. Antiochos was an old style general, he wanted to be the next Alexander. In the Ancient Warfare mag. there is a good describtion of the battle of Magnesia, and how it was won. In fact it was the king of Pergamon, whose name I forgot, allied to Rome that routed the chariots, light cavalry and skirmishers on the left wing of the Selucids. Antiochos was far away from events to influence events. In the end the Roman legions showered the phalanxes with pila.Originally Posted by keravnos
He should have used his superior cavalry to hammer the Romans from the flanks or rear, while the Phalangites, Agema , Galatians and other troops he had in his army kept them in check from the front. But it is this way that battles are won or lost at the end of the day.
Cheers
Bookmarks