Bugs and Patch Changes v1.5

[ByzantineKnight]

That was a bug with R:TW 1.0/1.1 but it was fixed with the 1.2 patch. Is it back? I never noticed it, but I haven't been playing vanilla much after 1.5.

Yah, all the troops not engaged in melee can fire, not fair

For why a diplomat of a enemy faction says
Their demands:
Accept or will attack
Their offers:
Please do not attack

Please CA fix this bugs, or we arent going to paly RTW anymore

Thats not a Bug, they say leave us alone or we will attack, its stupid but not a bug

[Caius]

Two bugs:
The music, some songs doesnt sound, thats wrong, and
FOR WHY HELL I CANNOT RETREAT FROM A CARTAGINIAN ATTACK?Yes, you are the Greeks, you retreat and you LOSSES all troops!And the problem is without figthing, they win

ANY person have this problem?

[Ludens]

ANY person have this problem?

If you have no movement points left, you cannot retreat. This applies to you as well as to the A.I. I have no problems with the music, but that doesn't mean it works for everyone.

Yah, all the troops not engaged in melee can fire, not fair

That's not the same. Akka reported the infamous primary/secondary issue that delayed the release of the 1.2 patch. However, it was fixed in 1.2 and I haven't noticed it since.

[Caius]

If you have no movement points left, you cannot retreat. This applies to you as well as to the A.I. I have no problems with the music, but that doesn't mean it works for everyone.

I have movement pionts left, when the carthaginians attack me, sometimes i have to retreat,I click in the white flag and my troops die
FOW WHY?

[Ludens]

I have movement pionts left, when the carthaginians attack me, sometimes i have to retreat,I click in the white flag and my troops die
FOW WHY?

I don't know. If there is no retreat the retreat button should be greyed out. There have been reports of disappearing troops, but this seems to be a rare glitch.

[Caius]

Thank for the help, but I cant play as the Greek Cities because of thisglitch

[Caius]

Thats not a Bug, they say leave us alone or we will attack, its stupid but not a bug

I can make a sreenshot demonstrating this it is true

[ByzantineKnight]

I can make a sreenshot demonstrating this it is true

Ive seen it happen before, i just said it wasnt a bug, its just stupid

[Caius]

You are rigth ByzantineKnight.
Other error.
I am sieging a city with stone walls.When you siege a stone wall, you can build all the types of siege equipment.I did pass the turn and i'm going to the city and im going to create a sap point.Here is the problem, i cannot build,"Construction of this siege equipment is not posible".

[ByzantineKnight]

You are rigth ByzantineKnight.
Other error.
I am sieging a city with stone walls.When you siege a stone wall, you can build all the types of siege equipment.I did pass the turn and i'm going to the city and im going to create a sap point.Here is the problem, i cannot build,"Construction of this siege equipment is not posible".

Did you have enough people to have build points?

[Caius]

Yes, I have 300 building points, but that not the point, because you can build a sap point in more turns than 1

[ByzantineKnight]

Yes, I have 300 building points, but that not the point, because you can build a sap point in more turns than 1

Do you have any patches installed or ATW/BI, do you just have a bad general, or something else

[Caius]

Something else,I guess

[ByzantineKnight]

Ok then i dono what happened, does it work now?

[Caius]

Sorry, I'm not sieging a city with stone wall at this moment

[ByzantineKnight]

Do you mean you were not seiging a city with stone walls or that you finished that city and have moved on to a new one?

[Caius]

For why a diplomat losses all or part of his skills when he fails a negotiation?

[ByzantineKnight]

I dont know, ive never seen that before

[Ludens]

For why a diplomat losses all or part of his skills when he fails a negotiation?

For the same reason he gains skill when he succeeds? This is not a bug. It's just an unbalanced feature.

[Caius]

For the same reason he gains skill when he succeeds? This is not a bug. It's just an unbalanced feature.

No.For example, i send a diplomat who have a diplomat trait, he fails and he losses the diplomat trait

[Ludens]

No.For example, i send a diplomat who have a diplomat trait, he fails and he losses the diplomat trait

What's wrong with that? If he succeeds in the next negotiation he will gain it again. The system is unbalanced, but not buggy.

[ByzantineKnight]

What is the use of Infulence anyway, Ive never had it affect a disscussion and ive had like 7 or 8 infulence.

[teja]

What is the use of Infulence anyway, Ive never had it affect a disscussion and ive had like 7 or 8 infulence.

This is not a bug but a question for gaming. You should make your question clearer. Do you mean the "influence" of a diplomat or of a general?
I assume you mean generals. The more influence, the better a general perform as a governor (affects loyalty), the bigger the chance of becoming the heir of a fraction, the better his chances in diplomatic talks - and if he is the leader of a fraction, he will not that often be the target of a new war. There will be more affects maybe, but that is what came back of my memories on first sight.

[Caius]

Here is the problem:
I send, for example, a diplomat, who haves a diplomat trait to make an alliance.The others says no, and when say no that diplomat loses the trait
and in the lists of retinues and traits says none

[Ludens]

Here is the problem:
I send, for example, a diplomat, who haves a diplomat trait to make an alliance.The others says no, and when say no that diplomat loses the trait
and in the lists of retinues and traits says none

If a diplomat fails on a mission, he will lose traits. If he succeeds, he will gain them. Not a bug.

[ByzantineKnight]

This is not a bug but a question for gaming. You should make your question clearer. Do you mean the "influence" of a diplomat or of a general?
I assume you mean generals. The more influence, the better a general perform as a governor (affects loyalty), the bigger the chance of becoming the heir of a fraction, the better his chances in diplomatic talks - and if he is the leader of a fraction, he will not that often be the target of a new war. There will be more affects maybe, but that is what came back of my memories on first sight.

I ment the influence of a diplomat, sorry

[Vergilius]

I'm still having problems with the 'issuing an individual order to a group' bug.
If I, for example, order a group of cavalry (for example 3 units) to attack a distant enemy, they just attack the closest enemy (which mostly happens to be a wall of spears).

[ByzantineKnight]

I'm still having problems with the 'issuing an individual order to a group' bug.
If I, for example, order a group of cavalry (for example 3 units) to attack a distant enemy, they just attack the closest enemy (which mostly happens to be a wall of spears).

I have that problem too, you just have to tell them to move near the unit you want to kill and when that unit is the closest to you, charge!

And if one of your horse units charge whatever you didn't want it to, it delays reinforcements for the unit you charged.

[Vergilius]

hmm.. I think I've encountered another bug..

if I put my troops like this:



the archers won't work; they'll make the shooting animation, but arrows won't appear nor will they hit anything...

[Ludens]

I think your archer's target is blocked by the Spartans. Missile units will try not to shoot friendly troops.