And I am tired of sources like the NYT used to support false claims, when the story linked provides only scant facts and one side of the story.I am more than a little tired about this "style" of debate; you're both champions at stifling any topic that disagrees with your personal beliefs by yelling first-out "Biased source!". And, of course, you never bother to discuss the actual topic, even after other sources are being brought to light, and refuse to qualify what ever would be an acceptable source for you.
Gee, maybe it wasn't the politics of the speaker she was advertising, but the fact that she was advertising a political speaker at all using her official work email and title.edit: Here's the email in cause. From a biased link, naturally, there is no other kind. But that's what Google gave me, unfortunately.
And unsurprisingly, the Austin article is much more specific in regards to the other reasons they had for firing her.
CR
Bookmarks