![]()
Originally Posted by TuffStuffMcGruff
![]()
Perhaps in another thread someday we can tangle on this one Tuff but I literally almost crapped myself when I read this.
![]()
Originally Posted by TuffStuffMcGruff
![]()
Perhaps in another thread someday we can tangle on this one Tuff but I literally almost crapped myself when I read this.
There are few things more annoying than some idiot who has never done anything trying to say definitively how something should be done.
Sua Sponte
Ha...ha...HAOriginally Posted by TuffStuffMcGruff
That is our problem how again? I'm so sick of this crap. Let someone else sort it out for once.I would love to go back to a simpler time, but I feel that the second we withdraw from the world stage, we will be in a downward spiral - defensively and in every other way.
All I want to do is live a peaceful life, raise a family, make a good income, and die happy.
I do love the idea though. You should vote for Ron Paul.![]()
I don't believe that the opinion is laughable. Many people believe just that and it dominates nearly all of American national politics. Debatable, yes. Laughable? probably not.Originally Posted by Ice
"That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
-Eric "George Orwell" Blair
"If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
(Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I didn't make the point about the "right" to intervene in the governance of other countries just for everyone to say: "I'm just saying it how it is". I was asking you wether you thought it was the best and right thing, for the world. Not from a selfish "it's good for us" point of view.
Originally Posted by Ice
Have you looked into the effects of what you support on the economy?
"Jorge Castañeda, Mexico's former foreign minister, writes in Newsweek online that Hugo Chavez attrempted to overturn the vote on his dictator-for-life constitutional "reforms" in Venezuela.
... by midweek enough information had emerged to conclude that Chávez did, in fact, try to overturn the results. As reported in El Nacional, and confirmed to me by an intelligence source, the Venezuelan military high command virtually threatened him with a coup d'état if he insisted on doing so. Finally, after a late-night phone call from Raúl Isaías Baduel, a budding opposition leader and former Chávez comrade in arms, the president conceded-but with one condition: he demanded his margin of defeat be reduced to a bare minimum in official tallies, so he could save face and appear as a magnanimous democrat in the eyes of the world. So after this purportedly narrow loss Chávez did not even request a recount, and nearly every Latin American colleague of Chávez's congratulated him for his "democratic" behavior..."
http://www.newsweek.com/id/74230
(I see that Xiahou has already posted this)
Last edited by ShaiHulud; 12-12-2007 at 11:40.
O stranger, Go tell the Spartans that we lie here, obedient to their will.....
Bookmarks