I'm noticing from PM's that people are starting the diplomacy early. While I applaud your enthusiasm, I would prefer to hold off on diplomacy until the factions are set in stone.
1.) As we saw in the Teutonic game, faction switching can potentially throw off previous diplomatic efforts.
2.) Starting the diplomacy now seems unfair to the people who haven't been confirmed yet. I'd hate for Ramses or Iggy to be left to fend for themselves simply because we set up our deals before they were even officially in the game.
As for Norway, I agree they should be player controlled. In a smaller game like Crusades/Brittania, it's important for all of the factions to be player controlled.
As for rules, a couple that seem to be standard with PBM's yet not enunciated in here yet are:
1.) Diplomacy has to be agreed to in PM's before its activated in the game.
2.) no reloading the save unless your computer crashes.
3.) tell people via PM if you do something they would be aware of in a SP game. Like defeat their army or take a city.
Of course if Zim says something different, that is what goes.![]()
*edit*
I just saw Zim's post about starting with Norway AI controlled. Could we wait just one or two more days for another player? Leaving Norway AI controlled will basically kill Norway. The new player would start out way behind on the diplomacy and infrastructure building.
Bookmarks