Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Boxing's Fight Of The Century?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #7
    Festering ruler of Insectica Member Slug For A Butt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Yorkshire...God's own country.
    Posts
    650

    Default Re: Boxing's Fight Of The Century?

    This sure as hell isn't the fight of the century. Has everyone forgotten Benn vs McClelland? Holyfield vs Tyson? Liston vs Clay? Foreman vs Ali? etc...
    Fight of the century my arse, but I'm staying up for it. GO HATTON. Teach that American version of Chris Eubank a lesson ( I'm convinced they are the same person after seeing the way he dresses, he's only missing the monocle.)

    But seriously, it's a good match up. Technically good but lightweight puncher vs bar room brawler.
    Not sure where my money is... but whoever wins this has to be the best pound for pound fighter in the world surely?

    BTW if anyone in the Halifax area wants to come and see it just PM me. I've got beer on the go and plenty of space (2 of 6 sofa spaces free atm).

    Quote Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief
    Fight of the Century?
    The "major" fights ever since have been last efforts from a dying sport, and none of them have truly been epic.
    I don't think it's a dying sport, just a sport that needs a few characters. Unfortunately it's judged by the personalities of the heavyweights and there ain't too much there at the moment.
    Last edited by Slug For A Butt; 12-09-2007 at 00:58.

    .
    A man may fight for many things. His country, his friends, his principles, the glistening tear on the cheek of a golden child. But personally, I'd mud-wrestle my own mother for a ton of cash, an amusing clock and a sack of French porn. - Blackadder
    .


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO