Greenest Hypocrites of 2007

[Viking]

So if my intention is to spread my seed instead of spreading science should I not be taken seriously either? Or how about if I spread butter and jam over a freshly toasted English muffin?

How can I take you seriously when it comes to vetting a source?

He does not care about whether global warming is man made or not; in his world man made global warming is not possible. He does not support his views with real science; despite that the website is supposedly scientific.

For instance this sentence:

A "leading debunker" of global warming by Rolling Stone magazine.

No scientist doubt global warming, we can all see it in the temperature data. As a scientific correct site one expect the phrasing to be correct and not direclty misleading like that.

Really, take a quick glance at the webpage and tell me it is not biased.

(and by biased I mean they have already found the truth on that site. no scientist may ever come and say humans ever affect the climate!)


Edit: LOL, browsing some more at that website's frontpage; it is truly ridiculous in scientific sense.