How would you define a "good" contribution, exactly? For some people, just pointing out how to become a member to junior members is a good contribution, for others it can just be spam. For some, writing a long guide on the use of Horse-Archers is a good contribution, whilst for others it can be a waste of time. It would be difficult to be just.
If I can put it like this, this system lets people decide what a good contribution is for themselves. It's called Democracy, I believe.
Bookmarks