History advices please

[Maksimus]

Thank you very much!

Anyway, you know that in EB Aegypt can raise 'Galatians' as a 'standard' army, still, I sure that AS used scythians, and most of Diadokhoi states

(that is, by 300bc the gole was around those states - but not live men - I think that the mercenaries from all around Europe and Asia played important role in fights and battles after Alexandar - also, the way one can express this in the game is either managing the 'more' non-native units recruitable in EDB or adding much more and cheaper mercenaries in DM file )

[pezhetairoi]

@G S Curio

About your opinion on the Celts, that may not be entirely correct. It however depends on what you mean by foreign troops, and whether you trust Julius Caesar, who mentioned the Sequani inviting Ariogaisus and several tens of thousands of Germans in to fight for them against the Aedui confederation. If you believe JC, then the Celts did indeed use Germans in at least the Late Republic. And again if you believe JC, I recalled that when (Publius Crassus, son of that rich man?) campaigned in Aquitania under JC, the Aquitanian tribes did engage Celtiberians or Iberi to join th struggle. Though I may have recalled wrong.

[Gaius Scribonius Curio]

Well as I say I'm not entirely sure.

But what I meant was a sizeable proportion of their standing/usual army was of foreign descent, not allied tribes that became embroiled in the conflict.

I have to say that I do believe Caesar at least in that the Sequani invited the Suebi to invade the lands of the Aedui, but it was my understanding that the Suebi remained a separate entity. Please correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't one of Caesar's excuses to invade Gallia Comata that he wanted to 'protect' the Gallic tribes from incursions made by the Germani, in particular the Helvetii, and the Suebi. Also it was my understanding that the Suebi betrayed the Sequani and demanded land to settle on, though I'm not sure.

The case of Publius Crassus, I believe that again the Celtiberians et al. were enlisted as allies rather than as soldiers of the Aquitanian tribes. But I may be completely wrong!

Anyway the point I am trying to make is that it was my opinion that the Gallic, Belgic and Germanic tribes relied mainly on their own troops for warfare and enlisted the help of other tribes as allies when required. I also believe that tribal loyalties may be the reason that individual groups of warriors didn't fight for other tribes. Which is what Pezhetairoi seems to be suggesting.

[Frostwulf]

I agree with pezhetairoi on this. Ariovistus and his troops according to JC were brought over as mercenaries. They defeated the Aedui and then turned on the Sequani. Also during this time some of the Belgic and Celtic tribes enlisted Germani to help them against the Romans. The Gauls of the Po Valley also enlisted the Gaesatae mercenaries against the Romans in the 220's.

[Gaius Scribonius Curio]

Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Now I know.

[Maksimus]

But how do we separate the 'common use' (as in terms of 'constant' use of non-homeland troops by some factions) that deserve to be 'in' EDB *txt as part of Factional MIC?

By that I ment that if there was a common use of the `germanic` and `stepe` and `celt` armies by some factions - then, what factions deserves to have them in factional MIC?

And, in 272bc which factions they were

note>these questions are a part of the ALX EB mod development