Very well. I accept your humble aplology, and in return I apologise to you.First of all I was explaining myself cause you said you did not comprehend what I had said. Second, there was no tone, I was just asking for clarification. Third, I have no problem with you marat, nor do I feel like getting in an argument with you or having any tension between us. It was just a question, a misunderstanding, and an explantion.
Why are you still here? To be frank Glenn, your novelty has more than worn off. At first, you were a joy to have around, an intellectual challenge. Now, you are becoming tiresome. If you are so offended by KnowMarat, then stop visiting it. It really is that simple.Marat is losing his appeal, the post count has slowed down considerably and nobody bothers to place a dramatic, "O", before his title anymore.
Let me be brutally and literally uncouth in saying, 'I told you so!'
Dear child, I would have to say Julius Caesar, if only for the sense of drama surrounding his death. Of course this is a blasé answer as, although I hate to admit it, I agree with Glenn's below post. Glenn, this does not mean that I no longer perceive you as a time waster.O, great Marat I have a query for you who would you say is better in your opinion: Julius Caesar or Augustus? I humblely await the enlightenment you will provide.
Award categories will be released later on today. Marat
Bookmarks