Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: A question of honour

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    King Philippe of France Senior Member _Tristan_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Reigning over France
    Posts
    3,264

    Default Re: A question of honour

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarian
    "Untrustworthy" refers mostly on backstabbing your allies. You should never attack allied faction, if you don't want to become "Untrustworthy", you must first cancel the alliance.
    Even cancelling an alliance out of the blue will get a rep hit... If you ever intend to go at war with someone, either do not ally (ever !!) or force them to strike first...

    Quote Originally Posted by Zaleukos
    Cancelling diplomatic agreements (except for when you have to drop an ally due to a declaration of war).
    Same here, being forced to choose between two of your allies going to war will almost always get you a rep hit (from my own experience) which is why you should refrain from allying with parties that are sure to go to war (like Byz and Turks for exemple...)
    King Baldwin the Tyrant, King of Jerusalem, Warden of the Holy Sepulchre, Slayer of Sultans in the Crusades Hotseat (new write-up here and previous write-up here)
    Methodios Tagaris, Caesar and Rebelin LotR
    Mexica Sunrise : An Aztec AAR



    Philippe 1er de France
    in King of the Franks

  2. #2

    Default Re: A question of honour

    Quote Originally Posted by Tristan de Castelreng
    Same here, being forced to choose between two of your allies going to war will almost always get you a rep hit (from my own experience) which is why you should refrain from allying with parties that are sure to go to war (like Byz and Turks for exemple...)
    It does go down, but I got the impression that breaking an alliance that way is less costly in reputation than cancelling the alliance in the diplomacy screen (and way less costly than declaring war on your ally). When I want to attack an ally I usually try to order a crusade against them, wait for another ally to attack them, and only join the crusade only after I had to choose which alliance to keep. This seems to give a much smaller reputation hit than joining the crusade when still allied to the crusade target.

    If the pope is young I also use crusades to complete the stupid "break alliance with excommed faction" missions, which otherwise are fairly costly in terms of reputation.

    The difference in the first case could of course stem from the difference between the penalties for "cancelling alliance + declaring war" and "declaring war on ally".

    Unfortunately it's largely guesswork on my part as I dont have a numerical value for reputation, but only the crudely discretised value in the diplomacy window...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO