I have question on your tactic, Foot. When waiting a city out, do you (1.) "resupply" your army (by retreating general in command to your territory and back again) or (2.) have it led by a captain only or (3.) do you suffer all those belt-tigthened/starving penalties?Originally Posted by Foot
I for one, usually have a general "A" who lead the army to the city, sieges it for a few turns, until being relieved by another (well-supplied) one. Is that fair to do?
BTW, for how long does an army have to stand in enemy territory before it get "plundered" (i.e. black spot appears)?
Actually, I think that sieges are a very interesting issues and I would like to invite other member to discuss their preferred conduct.
Bookmarks