Thanks! A pleasure to be here ^_^Welcome to the Org, Vantek! A pleasure to have you with us.
Thanks for the advice as well. In fact, had a battle where I needed it just today. I was attacking Burgundy, as Italians, with a 5 star general, on Expert (my first!). Since I had no cavalry I decided to go for a Pyrrhic victory against the odds (he had about six units of Chivalric Men-At-Arms, as well as two of Feudal Knights and four of Hobilars, I had various spearmen and Arbalesters), but it became a... how to say this... Pyrrhic loss? :P Casualties maybe 3:2 against me (rather than the hoped 2:3 for...). By the second battle the enemy was so weak however that I could mow him down.
Your suggestion worked perfectly in both cases. I happened to be lucky enough to have a unit of mercenary Mounted Crossbowmen, and they won me the conflict. First of all they mopped up redundantly placed siege engines in both battles. Then in the first one they didn't have to do much more to make the enemy launch a full attack, just dance near and shoot someone. In the second one he was just ridiculous. After I had wiped off the siege engineers, he chased me with a unit of 80 Chivalric Sergeants and let me shoot them down to 50 or so from twenty meters while they stood with their BACKS towards me. Then he sent a lone unit of PEASANTS, out of all units, to chase my ranged cavalry down straight into my ranks. They routed in a few seconds. Then he sent a lone unit of Chivalric Men-At-Arms straight into my ranks. He was shot down to half before he even reached my men, and routed as quickly. Then he sent pretty much everyone at me and unsurprisingly failed miserably. So yeah, I achieved some 6:1 victory when attacking by making my enemy attack me instead. I guess I never realised he might actually be stupid enough to do it. I may have to start limiting myself to keep a challenge!
Bookmarks