Quote Originally Posted by Redleg
Oh how soon one forgets their own statements from a previous post there young HoreTore. Denying you stated it when it is clearly posted in post #5 of this topic is surely a sign of being ridiculous on your part.

Now again why do you support burning another human being at the stake just because they serve the nation? Its a rethorical question completely based upon the statement that you alreadly made. An easy counter to your use of an emotional appeal arguement.

One should be more clever when attempting an emotional appeal arguement, because it often backfires against you. Free Speech is a great topic for using emotional appeal, however you went about it in the wrong way by advocating the destruction of another human being because of the job that they perform for the state. Yes you did it in an indirect way, but the statement does indeed advocate the destruction of another human. Its really a rather simple retort of your statement, that takes the verbage for what it states discounting what you might have wanted to actually state.
Though I was disgusted by Horetore's statement there I assumed that he didn't mean it literally. If anything I thought it was a 'witchhunt' reference of really poor taste that he was making, because that is what this is in Berkley, a witchhunt.