In keeping with my Sultan's commitment to peace, we have offered the Romans a sizeable pact filled with terms of peace. It is most fair, in the Sultan's opinion, and if the Roman were to disagree on that judgment, the Sultan has left all the terms of the treaty open for discussion, debate, and reason. Indeed, all the terms are negotiable.
The Romans who most threaten the Turks, who claim all the lands on our borders, we have offered them peace.
If this is so, then why can there not be peace between the Georgian and the Seljuk? Truly we value our Georgian neighbors as trade partners, and we value the lives of our Muslim brothers even more so.
Since I am not an involved party, I cannot offer terms. I would merely suggest that the Georgian expand his territories north and to the west, while the Seljuk spread his armies into rebel lands, and respect the territorial claims of other nations. For the lives lost in this struggle, reparations would seem to be in order as well.
Due to the misunderstanding, such reparations should be light. Perhaps a bulk sum of 1500, or 4 payments of 500, whichever the Seljuk prefers.
In the scheme of things, the lives of the men lost should be worth more than that, but as your friends and as a student of history, I know that excessive reparations will only lead to resentment and hostility. These reparations are not to be taken as payment for lives, but symbolic of peaceful intentions and goodwill only.
I do not wish to insult either side with this humble suggestion. If such advice is unwanted, please consult my ambassador privately and I will refrain from making such comments in the future.
Bookmarks