The ambassador is visibly offended by this
and how do you suggest we tried to drive the Seljuks and Ghanzivids to war?

we gave one of the others movements and troop strenght, that hardly counts as attempting to bring them into conflict, unless of course Ghanzi were planning on invading the seljuks, which they assured us, they were not.

If the romans had not attacked Armenia, would you not send them the same infomation if they (romani) were massing on the armenian border right now?

This admits that we have several spies in seljuk provinces, which they are, but they are not in fact, in their cities sowing discontent, so I fail to see how that can be seen as an act of war, unlike say, infiltrating our city and killing our shah in a sneak attack....

We admitted to our mistakes, apologised for them (though we doubt this was needed), thats hardly the action of a warmongering state, or an excuse for war.

His eyes darken

Do not pretend turk, that you can be considered a friend of the Khwarezm by keeping your troops our of a war several hundred miles away, when the romans are keeping them in check.
Nor should you pretend that this "coalition of peace" is anything more than an excuse for its western members to attack whomever they please.