Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: Shields?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #23
    Member Member geala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Hannover, Germany
    Posts
    465

    Default Re: Shields?

    The ability to penetrate cuirasses and shields is always a matter of the involved material of the defense and the energy, shape and consistence of the bullet.

    The mostly used projectile was a round soft lead ball which lost energy very soon and had in general bad penetration ability even when shot from muskets (compared to modern conical bullets, both full metall jacket or the partly mantled variants). At about 50 metres the musket bullets were not able to penetrate the armour of a cuirassier.

    I'm not at all a specialist for American history (you see that in my poor literature available) but that low velocity musket balls could be deflected by leather shields of the American Indians, made of strong buffalo hide and stuffed with soft material, is f.e. stated in Osprey MMA Nr. 163 "The American Plains Indians" p. 23 (without a reference to an original source).

    So the statement of Mr Frost is totally believable given the fact that he refers to a .36 black powder revolver with ball munition and very low energy (compared to modern handgun bullets).
    Last edited by geala; 03-23-2008 at 11:42.
    The queen commands and we'll obey
    Over the Hills and far away.
    (perhaps from an English Traditional, about 1700 AD)

    Drum, Kinder, seid lustig und allesamt bereit:
    Auf, Ansbach-Dragoner! Auf, Ansbach-Bayreuth!
    (later chorus -containing a wrong regimental name for the Bayreuth-Dragoner (DR Nr. 5) - of the "Hohenfriedberger Marsch", reminiscense of a battle in 1745 AD, to the music perhaps of an earlier cuirassier march)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO