Plants also need light but that does not prevent us from having terms like Light pollution.Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
If the scientists are indeed correct about its impact then its certainly fair to call CO2 a pollutant.
CBR
Plants also need light but that does not prevent us from having terms like Light pollution.Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
If the scientists are indeed correct about its impact then its certainly fair to call CO2 a pollutant.
CBR
Then very breathing animal is a polluter since we all release CO2 as part of the breathing process.Originally Posted by CBR
Yes CR CO2 released by factories is considered a pollution because its far beyond the normal process of life.
O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean
A simple experiment should be sufficient to show correctness of the thoughts on CO2 ....what happens if you increase CO2 levels in a greenhouse ?If the scientists are indeed correct about its impact then its certainly fair to call CO2 a pollutant.
Or to take it further , use this....and ask what is the effect of increased CO2 levels on the breathing process of animals ?(you could use the greenhouse example againThen very breathing animal is a polluter since we all release CO2 as part of the breathing process.)
and finish by taking this...and asking what are the regulations on exposure to CO2 in factories and during industrial processess that produce CO2 ?Yes CR CO2 released by factories is considered a pollution because its far beyond the normal process of life.
why are there limits if it isn't a pollutant ? after all its good for plants so it can't be bad .
Soooooo.......yes it is a pollutant Rabbit , simple as that![]()
Bookmarks